...
首页> 外文期刊>Auditing >The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Fees
【24h】

The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Fees

机译:第五号审计准则对审计费用的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In June 2007, the PCAOB issued Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS5), superseding Auditing Standard No. 2 (AS2). AS5 significantly changed the rules relating to audits of internal control over financial reporting (ICFR). Policymakers expected AS5 to lead to improvements in audit efficiency and thus a general reduction in audit costs, and specifically a reduction in fees for smaller and less complex companies that were disproportionately affected by AS2. We investigate the impact of the change from AS2 to AS5 on audit fees. We restrict our analysis to stable client-auditor combinations to ensure that auditors had prior AS2 experience with the client before the transition to AS5. We find that, after controlling for other factors, audit fees were lower in the first two years of implementation of AS5 relative to the last year of AS2. The decrease in fees was the highest for companies that had remediated material weaknesses in their internal control and thus moved from an adverse opinion under AS2 to a clean opinion under AS5. Further, firms that received first-time adverse opinions on their internal control in the AS5 period paid lower fee premiums (relative to firms with clean opinions) than did firms with adverse reports in the last AS2 year. Finally, in contrast to policymakers' expectations that AS5 would generate cost savings by allowing the ICFR audits to be "scaled" for small and less complex firms, there is no evidence that the smallest firms benefited. Specifically, audit fee savings were found only for relatively more complex firms (measured by multiple segments and international operations).
机译:2007年6月,PCAOB发布了第5号审核标准(AS5),取代了第2号审核标准(AS2)。 AS5大大改变了有关财务报告内部控制审核(ICFR)的规则。政策制定者期望AS5能够提高审计效率,从而总体上降低审计成本,尤其是减少受AS2影响不大的较小和较不复杂的公司的费用。我们调查了从AS2到AS5的变更对审计费用的影响。我们将分析限于稳定的客户-审计师组合,以确保审计师在过渡到AS5之前具有与客户的AS2经验。我们发现,在控制了其他因素之后,实施AS5的前两年的审计费用要比AS2的最后一年低。对于已弥补内部控制重大缺陷从而从AS2的不利意见转变为AS5的明确意见的公司而言,费用减幅最高。此外,在AS5期间首次收到对其内部控制不利的意见的公司,其费用溢价(相对于具有明确意见的公司)要比上一AS2年度具有不利报告的公司要低。最后,与政策制定者期望AS5将通过允许对较小和较不复杂的公司进行ICFR审计“规模化”来节省成本相比,没有证据表明最小的公司会从中受益。具体而言,仅针对相对较复杂的公司(按多个部门和国际业务衡量),才发现节省了审计费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号