首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric research >Projection and uncertainty of precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 multimodel ensembles over nine major basins in China
【24h】

Projection and uncertainty of precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 multimodel ensembles over nine major basins in China

机译:中国9个主要盆地CMIP5多模型集合体中极端降水的投影和不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study presented an analysis of projection and uncertainty of precipitation extremes over 9 river basins in China based on the outputs of 18 global climate models (GCMs) with 3 Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) from the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The temporal and spatial changes in precipitation extremes for the period 2020-2100 were analyzed using the climate indices defined by the Expert Team on Climate Detection and Indices (ETCCDI). Uncertainty of GCMs and RCPs in the projections of precipitation extremes was quantified using the variance-based sensitivity analysis method. The model simulations generally predict a consistent intensification of precipitation extremes during the 21st century with respect to different RCPs scenarios: the higher emission scenarios (e.g., RCP8.5), the larger intensity and frequency of precipitation extremes. The projected changes in precipitation extremes exhibit a large spatial variation across China. The high-latitude and high elevation regions of China (e.g., Continental and Southwest basins) are projected to respond more strongly to the increase in precipitation amount and intensity (e.g., RCPTOT, RX1day and RX5day), while southeastern and southern China (e.g., Southeast and Pearl River basins) tend to be more sensitive to the increase in the frequency of precipitation extreme (e.g., R10mm and R20mm). Consecutive dry days (CDD) is projected to decrease in northern China (e.g., Continental basin) but increase in southern China (e.g., Southeast, Pearl River, and Yangtze River basins). Uncertainty analysis shows that variation of GCMs contributes 90% uncertainty of precipitation extremes projections for the whole China, with larger uncertainty range under the higher emission scenarios (e.g., RCP8.5). The uncertainty from RCPs is generally limited (contribution 10%) in comparison with GCMs, and slightly increases with the long-term projections of precipitation extremes.
机译:这项研究基于耦合模型间比较项目第五阶段(CMIP5)的18种全球气候模型(GCM)和3种代表性浓度路径(RCP)的输出,对中国9个流域的极端降水预测和不确定性进行了分析。 )。使用气候探测和指数专家组(ETCCDI)定义的气候指数分析了2020-2100年期间极端降水的时空变化。使用基于方差的敏感性分析方法对极端降水预测中的GCM和RCP的不确定性进行了量化。模型模拟通常会预测21世纪期间不同RCP情景下极端降水的持续加剧:更高的排放情景(例如RCP8.5),更大强度和极端降水频率。预计的极端降水变化将在全国范围内表现出较大的空间变化。预计中国的高纬度和高海拔地区(例如大陆和西南盆地)对降水量和强度的增加(例如RCPTOT,RX1day和RX5day)的响应会更强烈,而中国东南部和南部(例如,东南流域和珠江流域)对极端降水频率(例如,R10mm和R20mm)的频率增加更为敏感。预计连续干旱天数(CDD)在中国北部(例如大陆盆地)减少,但在中国南部(例如东南,珠江和长江流域)增加。不确定性分析表明,GCM的变化对整个中国的极端降水预测有90%以上的不确定性,在较高排放情景下(例如RCP8.5),不确定性范围更大。与GCM相比,RCP的不确定性通常是有限的(贡献<10%),并且随着降水极端事件的长期预测而略有增加。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric research》 |2019年第9期|122-137|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Jinan Univ, Inst Groundwater & Earth Sci, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

    Jinan Univ, Inst Groundwater & Earth Sci, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

    China Univ Geosci, Sch Water Resources & Environm, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China;

    Jinan Univ, Inst Groundwater & Earth Sci, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

    Jinan Univ, Inst Groundwater & Earth Sci, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

    Jinan Univ, Inst Groundwater & Earth Sci, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Precipitation extremes; Projected changes; Uncertainty; ETCCDI; CMIP5; China;

    机译:极端降水;预测的变化;不确定性;ETCCDI;CMIP5;中国;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号