首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >The impact of fireworks control on air quality in four Northern Chinese cities during the Spring Festival
【24h】

The impact of fireworks control on air quality in four Northern Chinese cities during the Spring Festival

机译:烟花控制对春节四个北方城市空气质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Online measurements for chemical components in PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mu m) were carried out in Qinhuangdao (QHD), Tangshan (TS), Shijiazhuang (SJZ), and Zhengzhou (ZZ), China, from December 14, 2016 to February 2, 2017 to assess the impact of the fireworks control on air quality during the Spring Festival. Pre-fireworks, fireworks, and post-fireworks periods were all assessed. Results show that average concentrations of PM2.5 during fireworks periods were in the following order of SJZ ZZ TS QHD. Fireworks displays have great impacts on concentrations of K+, SO42-, Cl, Mg2+, and OC. According to results of PM2.5 source apportionment, fireworks were the largest PM2.5 source during fireworks periods in QHD, TS, SJZ, and ZZ, accounting for 68.9%, 53.8%, 61.1%, and 51.0% of PM2.5, respectively. This result was similar to the result of the relative ratio method (68.6% in QHD, 57.2% in TS, 63.0% in SJZ, 53.9% in ZZ). Based on results of PM2.5 source apportionment, the contribution of fireworks from 19:00 on January 27 to 8:00 on January 28 to PM2.5 in ZZ (44.1%) was the lowest in comparison with QHD (75.7%), TS (66.0%), and SJZ (63.8%), which can be ascribed to stringent fireworks control measures in ZZ. Although fireworks displays were banned in QHD and SJZ during the Spring Festival, contributions of fireworks to PM2.5 in these two cities were higher or slightly lower than that of TS during the special period when fireworks were allowed to be set off in TS, indicating that no stringent measures were taken to effectively control fireworks displays in QHD and SJZ. These results highlight the necessity of limiting fireworks emissions during the Spring Festival.
机译:在秦皇岛(QHD),唐山(TS),石家庄(SJZ)和郑州(ZZ),中国,秦皇岛(QHD),唐山(TS),中国,中国,郑州(QHD)在线测量(具有小于2.5亩的空气动力直径小于2.5μm的颗粒物质)的在线测量2016年12月14日至2017年2月2日评估烟花控制对春节期间空气质量的影响。烟花前烟花,烟花和烟花后期都得到评估。结果表明,烟花期间PM2.5的平均浓度是下列SJZ> ZZ> TS> QHD的顺序。烟花显示器对K +,SO42 - ,Cl,Mg2 +和OC的浓度产生很大影响。根据PM2.5的结果分配,烟花是QHD,TS,SJZ和ZZ的烟花期间最大的PM2.5来源,占68.9%,53.8%,61.1%和51.0%的PM2.5,分别。该结果与相对比法的结果类似(QHD中的68.6%,TS的57.2%,SJZ中的63.0%,ZZ 53.9%)。根据PM2.5源分摊的结果,1月28日1月28日至8:00从19:00到PM2.5在ZZ(44.1%)中的贡献是与QHD(75.7%)相比的最低(75.7%) TS(66.0%)和SJZ(63.8%),可以归因于ZZ的严格烟花控制措施。虽然在春节期间,烟花显示器被禁止在QHD和SJZ中,但是当允许在TS中将烟花出示时,这两个城市中,这两个城市中,烟花到PM2.5的贡献比TS更高或略低于TS。没有采取严格的措施来有效地控制QHD和SJZ中的烟花。这些结果突出了春节期间限制烟花排放的必要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric environment》 |2021年第1期|117958.1-117958.10|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Beijing Univ Chem Technol Dept Environm Sci & Engn Beijing 100029 Peoples R China|Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci Beijing 100012 Peoples R China;

    Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci Beijing 100012 Peoples R China;

    China Meteorol Adm Inst Urban Meteorol Beijing 100089 Peoples R China;

    Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci Beijing 100012 Peoples R China;

    Beijing Univ Chem Technol Dept Environm Sci & Engn Beijing 100029 Peoples R China;

    Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci Beijing 100012 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Spring Festival; PM2.5; Chemical components; Fireworks displays; Contribution; Control measures;

    机译:春节;PM2.5;化学成分;烟花显示;贡献;控制措施;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 23:02:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号