首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Inter-comparison of three instruments for measuring regional background carbon monoxide
【24h】

Inter-comparison of three instruments for measuring regional background carbon monoxide

机译:三种用于测量区域背景一氧化碳的仪器的比对

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three CO instruments, i.e., vacuum ultraviolet resonance fluorescence (VUV-RF), gas chromatography/ reduction gas detection (GC/RGD), and non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) spectrometry, were inter-compared at a background site, i.e., Lulin Atmospheric Baseline Station (LABS) in central Taiwan. For a period of 18 days of continuous measurements, highly coherent results were observed between the three instruments. Calibration of the GC/RGD and VUV-RF was based on the same batch of CO standards, producing results that agreed within 4%. Nevertheless, NDIR displayed a significant bias with a large offset compared to the other two instruments (about -63.1 ppb), due mainly to its over-simplified calibration procedure. The NDIR bias was then removed by aligning the NDIR data to those of GC/RGD in a process termed "post-run correction". Through this practice, the NDIR was linked to the same calibration scale as that of GC/RGD. As a result, by simultaneously exploiting both GC/RGD and NDIR to measure background CO, both time-resolution and accuracy can be secured.
机译:在背景位置,即Lulin,对三种CO仪器进行了比较,即真空紫外共振荧光(VUV-RF),气相色谱/还原气检测(GC / RGD)和非分散红外(NDIR)光谱。台湾中部的大气基准站(LABS)。经过18天的连续测量,在这三台仪器之间观察到了高度连贯的结果。 GC / RGD和VUV-RF的校准基于同一批次的CO标准品,其结果一致在4%之内。尽管如此,与其他两种仪器相比,NDIR仍显示出明显的偏差和较大的偏差(约-63.1 ppb),这主要是由于其校准程序过于简化。然后通过在称为“运行后校正”的过程中将NDIR数据与GC / RGD的数据对齐,从而消除NDIR偏差。通过这种做法,NDIR被链接到与GC / RGD相同的校准标度。结果,通过同时利用GC / RGD和NDIR来测量背景CO,可以确保时间分辨率和准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号