首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >A three-year time-series of dust deposition flux measurements in Gran Canada, Spain: A comparison of wet and dry surface deposition samplers
【24h】

A three-year time-series of dust deposition flux measurements in Gran Canada, Spain: A comparison of wet and dry surface deposition samplers

机译:西班牙大加拿大的粉尘沉积通量测量的三年时间序列:干湿表面沉积采样器的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A three-year dataset of particle deposition flux measurements in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, is presented. As part of this work, a comparison between wet and dry surrogate surfaces to estimate dry deposition fluxes was carried out over a period of more than two years in order to compare the particle collection efficiency of both devices. The selected recipients were buckets placed in two commercial samplers (ARS 1000, MTX Italy) equipped with a rain sensor; one of which was modified to maintain a constant volume of water during the collection time. No relationship was found between dry deposition fluxes and meteorological conditions (such as wind speed), the volume of the deposition container, or the number of days sampled. Dry deposition measurements made using a wet plate were 94% (±7%) of the corresponding measurements made by dry plate, and therefore are no better for the collection of particles. While both systems showed consistent results, with no significant differences in the estimation of total flux, the use of wet plates increased the uncertainty in the measurements and the complexity of the sampling method.During 2009-2012, wet and dry deposition fluxes showed a marked seasonality with a maximum in spring. Dry deposition dominated the particle fluxes (more than 93% of the total flux) and a value of 25.0 ± 0.3 mg m~(-2) d~(-1) was measured. Estimated dry deposition velocity was 0.85 ± 0.38 cm s~(-1), in good agreement with previously reported values.
机译:介绍了加那利群岛大加那利岛的三年颗粒沉积通量测量数据集。作为这项工作的一部分,在超过两年的时间内进行了湿和干替代表面之间的比较以估计干沉积通量,以便比较两个设备的颗粒收集效率。选定的接收者是放置在两个装有雨量传感器的商业采样器(ARS 1000,意大利MTX)中的水桶;其中之一被修改为在收集时间内保持恒定的水量。在干燥的沉积通量和气象条件(例如风速),沉积容器的体积或采样天数之间未发现任何关系。使用湿板进行的干沉降测量值是干板进行的相应测量值的94%(±7%),因此,对于收集颗粒而言并没有更好的表现。虽然两个系统都显示出一致的结果,但总通量的估算没有显着差异,但湿板的使用增加了测量的不确定性和采样方法的复杂性.2009-2012年期间,干式和湿式沉积通量显示出明显的变化。春季最多的季节性。干法沉积占颗粒通量的主要部分(占总通量的93%以上),测量值为25.0±0.3 mg m〜(-2)d〜(-1)。估计的干沉降速度为0.85±0.38 cm s〜(-1),与先前报道的值非常吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号