...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Outdoor air 1,3-butadiene monitoring: Comparison of performance of Radiello passive samplers and active multi-sorbent bed tubes
【24h】

Outdoor air 1,3-butadiene monitoring: Comparison of performance of Radiello passive samplers and active multi-sorbent bed tubes

机译:室外空气1,3-丁二烯监测:Radiello被动采样器和主动多吸收剂床管的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A comparison was made between the relative performance of active and passive sampling methods for the analysis of 1,3-butadiene in outdoor air. Active and passive sampling was conducted using multi-sorbent bed tubes (Carbotrap, Carbopack X, Carboxen 569) and RAD141 Radiello (R) diffusive samplers (filled with Carbopack X), respectively. Daily duplicate samples of multi-sorbent bed tubes were taken over a period of 14 days (9 + 5 days) at El Morell (Tarragona, Spain), near the petrochemical area. As 1,3-butadiene is a reactive pollutant and can be rapidly oxidized, half of the samplers were equipped with ozone scrubbers. Samples consisted in two tubes connected in series (front and back) to allow the determination of breakthrough. Quadruplicate samples of Radiello (R) tubes were taken over a period of 14 days (9 days and 5 days), too. During those days, ozone concentration was measured using RAD172 Radiello (R). samplers. In addition to this, daily duplicate samples of multi-sorbent bed tubes were taken in the city of Barcelona over a period of 8 days. Simultaneously, 4 samples of Radiello (R) tubes were exposed to outdoor air. Sampling was done throughout June and July 2017. Analysis was performed by thermal desorption coupled with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Analytical performance of the two sampling methods was evaluated by describing several quality assurance parameters, with results showing that performances are quite similar. They display low detection limits, good precision, linearity and desorption efficiency, low levels of blank values, and low breakthrough for multi-sorbent bed tubes. However, Radiello (R) samplers were not able to uptake episodic 1,3-butadiene high concentrations, leading to underestimation of real values. Hence, we can conclude that Radiello (R) samplers can be used for baseline 1,3-butadiene levels whereas multi-sorbent bed tubes would be advisable when relevant episodes are expected.
机译:在主动和被动采样方法的相对性能之间进行了比较,以分析室外空气中的1,3-丁二烯。主动和被动采样分别使用多吸附剂床管(Carbotrap,Carbopack X,Carboxen 569)和RAD141 Radiello(R)扩散采样器(装有Carbopack X)进行。在石化区附近的El Morell(西班牙塔拉戈纳),在14天(9 + 5天)的时间内,每天采集多吸附剂床管的重复样品。由于1,3-丁二烯是一种活性污染物,可以被快速氧化,因此一半的采样器配备了臭氧洗涤器。样品由两个串联连接的管子(前管和后管)组成,以便确定穿透强度。还在14天(9天和5天)的时间内采集了Radiello(R)管的一式四份样品。在那几天,使用RAD172 Radiello(R)测量臭氧浓度。采样器。除此之外,在巴塞罗那市进行了为期8天的每日多次重复的多吸附剂床管采样。同时,将Radiello(R)管的4个样品暴露在室外空气中。整个2017年6月和7月进行了采样。分析是通过热脱附与气相色谱/质谱联用进行的。通过描述几个质量保证参数评估了两种采样方法的分析性能,结果表明性能非常相似。它们显示出低检测限,良好的精密度,线性和解吸效率,低空白值和对多吸附剂床管的低穿透性。但是,Radiello(R)采样器无法摄取偶发的1,3-丁二烯高浓度,从而导致实际价值低估。因此,我们可以得出结论,可以将Radiello(R)采样器用于基线1,3-丁二烯水平,而当预期发生相关事件时,建议使用多吸附剂床管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号