首页> 外文期刊>The Astrophysical journal >IS THERE EVIDENCE FOR REPEATING GAMMA-RAY BURSTERS IN THE BATSE DATA?
【24h】

IS THERE EVIDENCE FOR REPEATING GAMMA-RAY BURSTERS IN THE BATSE DATA?

机译:是否有证据可以在BATSE数据中重复显示伽马射线冲击波?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The possibility that classical gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) occasionally repeat from the same locations on the sky provides a critical test of GRB models. There is currently some controversy about whether there is evidence for burst repetition in the Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) data. We introduce a gamma-ray burst "pair-matching" statistic that can be used to search for a repeater signal in the BATSE data. The pair-matching statistic is built upon the reported position errors for each burst and is more sensitive than previously used statistics at detecting faint repeating bursts or multiple burst recurrences. It is also less likely to produce (false) evidence of burst repetition due to correlations in the positions that are inconsistent with repeating bursters. We find that the excesses in "matched" and "antipodal" pairs seen with other statistics are caused by an excess of pairs with a separation smaller than their error bars would indicate. When we consider all separations consistent with the error bars, no significant signal remains. We conclude that the publicly available BATSE 1B and 2B data sets contain no evidence for repeating gamma-ray bursters.
机译:经典伽马射线爆发(GRB)偶尔从天空的相同位置重复出现的可能性,对GRB模型进行了严格的测试。当前,关于“突发和瞬态源实验”(BATSE)数据中是否存在突发重复的证据,存在一些争议。我们介绍了可用于在BATSE数据中搜索中继器信号的伽马射线猝发“成对匹配”统计信息。对匹配统计信息基于每个突发报告的位置误差,并且比以前使用的统计信息在检测微弱的重复突发或多次突发重复发生时更加敏感。由于与重复爆发器不一致的位置相关性,它也不太可能产生(错误)爆发重复的证据。我们发现与其他统计数据相比,“匹配”对和“对映体”对中的过量是由对的过量引起的,其间隔小于其误差线所指示的距离。当我们认为所有间隔均与误差线一致时,则没有明显的信号残留。我们得出的结论是,公开可用的BATSE 1B和2B数据集没有重复伽玛射线爆发的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号