首页> 外文期刊>Aslib Proceedings >The evolution of goal-based information modelling: literature review
【24h】

The evolution of goal-based information modelling: literature review

机译:基于目标的信息建模的发展:文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The first in a series on goal-based information modelling, this paper presents a literature review of two goal-based measurement methods. The second article in the series will build on this background to present an overview of some recent case-based research that shows the applicability of the goal-based methods for information modelling (as opposed to measurement). The third and concluding article in the series will present a new goal-based information model - the goal-based information framework (GbIF) - that is well suited to the task of documenting and evaluating organisational information flow. Design/methodology /approach - Following a literature review of the goal-question-metric (GQM) and goal-question-indicator-measure (GQIM) methods, the paper presents the strengths and weaknesses of goal-based approaches. Findings - The literature indicates that the goal-based methods are both rigorous and adaptable. With over 20 years of use, goal-based methods have achieved demonstrable and quantifiable results in both practitioner and academic studies. The down side of the methods are the potential expense and the "expansiveness" of goal-based models. The overheads of managing the goal-based process, from early negotiations on objectives and goals to maintaining the model (adding new goals, questions and indicators), could make the method unwieldy and expensive for organisations with limited resources. An additional challenge identified in the literature is the narrow focus of "top-down" (i.e. goal-based) methods. Since the methods limit the focus to a pre-defined set of goals and questions, the opportunity for discovery of new information is limited. Research limitations/implications - Much of the previous work on goal-based methodologies has been confined to software measurement contexts in larger organisations with well-established information gathering processes. Although the next part of the series presents goal-based methods outside of this native context, and within low maturity organisations, further work needs to be done to understand the applicability of these methods in the information science discipline. Originality/value - This paper presents an overview of goal-based methods. The next article in the series will present the method outside the native context of software measurement. With the universality of the method established, information scientists will have a new tool to evaluate and document organisational information flow.
机译:目的-本文是基于目标的信息建模系列文章中的第一篇,本文对两种基于目标的测量方法进行了文献综述。本系列的第二篇文章将以此为背景,概述一些基于案例的最新研究,这些研究表明基于目标的方法在信息建模(而不是测量)方面的适用性。该系列的第三篇和最后一篇文章将介绍一个新的基于目标的信息模型-基于目标的信息框架(GbIF)-非常适合记录和评估组织信息流的任务。设计/方法/方法-在对目标问题度量(GQM)和目标问题指示符(GQIM)方法进行文献综述之后,本文介绍了基于目标的方法的优缺点。结果-文献表明,基于目标的方法既严格又适应性强。经过20多年的使用,基于目标的方法在从业人员和学术研究中均取得了可证明和可量化的结果。这些方法的缺点是潜在成本和基于目标的模型的“扩展性”。从基于目标和目标的早期谈判到维护模型(添加新的目标,问题和指标)的管理基于目标的流程的开销,对于资源有限的组织而言,可能会使该方法变得笨拙且昂贵。文献中确定的另一个挑战是“自上而下”(即基于目标)方法的狭窄关注。由于这些方法将焦点限制在一组预先定义的目标和问题上,因此发现新信息的机会有限。研究的局限性/意义-以前有关基于目标的方法的许多工作仅限于具有完善的信息收集流程的大型组织中的软件度量环境。尽管本系列的下一部分将介绍基于目标的方法,而不是本机环境中以及成熟度较低的组织内,但需要做进一步的工作来理解这些方法在信息科学学科中的适用性。创意/价值-本文概述了基于目标的方法。本系列的下一篇文章将在软件测量的本机上下文之外介绍该方法。有了这种方法的普遍性,信息科学家将拥有一种评估和记录组织信息流的新工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号