首页> 外文期刊>ABA banking journal >Should We Require Restrictive Endorsements on Remote Business Deposits?
【24h】

Should We Require Restrictive Endorsements on Remote Business Deposits?

机译:我们是否应该要求对远程企业存款进行限制性背书?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Q/I have a question about the remote deposit capture provisions of the newly revised Regulation CC. Under revised §229.34(f), a depositary bank that receives a remotely deposited check generally indemnifies a second depositary bank that has accepted the original paper check. However, the bank accepting the paper check is not protected if the original paper check has a restrictive endorsement consistent with the means of deposit, such as "for mobile deposit only to XYZ Bank."
机译:问/我对新修订的CC法规中的远程存款捕获规定有疑问。根据修订的第229.34(f)条,接受远程存入支票的存托银行通常会对接受原始纸质支票的第二家存托银行进行赔偿。但是,如果原始纸质支票具有与存款方式一致的限制性背书,例如“仅用于XYZ银行的移动存款”,则接受纸质支票的银行将不受保护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号