...
首页> 外文期刊>Asia Pacific Fire Magazine >Factors to consider before any C8 firefighting foam transition
【24h】

Factors to consider before any C8 firefighting foam transition

机译:在任何C8消防泡沫过渡之前考虑的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The big question is: what should we use to replace those legacy C8 foams to ensure effective outcomes? Do we choose Fluorine Free Foams (F3s) without key benefits relied upon for decades to keep us safe? Or do we accept more benign high-purity short-chain C6 PFAS foam alternatives (C6s), achieving reliable, fast-acting, fuel-shedding, vapour-sealing extinguishment, without perpetuating that C8 legacy? Avoiding unintentional compromises to original system design objectives is key to protecting lives, critical infrastructure and communities from harm when making such pivotal decisions.
机译:大问题是:我们应该用什么来替换这些遗产C8泡沫以确保有效的结果? 我们是否选择氟的泡沫(F3s)而无需关键效益,几十年来保持我们的安全? 或者我们接受更多良性高纯度短链C6 PFAS泡沫替代品(C6S),实现可靠,快速行动,燃料脱落,蒸气密封灭火,而不会延续C8遗产? 避免对原始系统设计目标的无意妥协是在制定这种关键决策时保护生命,关键基础设施和社区的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号