首页> 外文期刊>ASHRAE Transactions >Business and Technical Concepts for Deep Energy Retrofit of Public Buildings
【24h】

Business and Technical Concepts for Deep Energy Retrofit of Public Buildings

机译:公共建筑深层能源改造的业务和技术概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many governments worldwide are setting more stringent targets for reductions in energy use in government/public buildings. Buildings constructed more than 10 years ago account for a major share of energy used by the building stock. However, the funding and "know-how" (applied knowledge) available for owner-directed energy retrofit projects has not kept pace with new requirements. With typical retrofit projects, reduction of energy use varies between 10% and 20%, while experience from executed projects around the globe shows that energy-use reduction can exceed 50%, and renovated buildings can cost-effectively achieve the passive-house standard or even approach net zero energy status (Hermelink and Mutter, 2010; NBI 2014; RICS 2013; GreenBuildingAdvisor.com 2013; Shonder and Nasseri 2015; Miller and Higgins 2015; Emmerich et al. 2011). Previous research conducted under the International Energy Agency's Energy in Buildings and Communities Program (IEA EBC) Annex 46 identified and analyzed more than 400 energy-efficiency measures that can be used when buildings are retrofitted. Measures include those related to the building envelope, mechanical and lighting systems, energy generation and distribution, and internal processes. Implementation of some individual measures (such as building envelope insulation, improved airtightness, and cogeneration) can significantly reduce building heating and cooling loads or minimize of energy waste, but require significant investments with long paybacks. However, when a limited number of core technologies are implemented together, or bundled, they can significantly reduce energy use for a smaller investment, thereby providing a faster payback. In some countries, energy savings performance contracts (ESPC) have proven to be an effective tool for implementing energy retrofit projects. Nevertheless, in many countries the number of projects funded by ESPCs still do not form a significant part of the total investment budgeted by public institutions for energy retrofits. This paper presents the concept and several case studies that illustrate mechanisms that will increase the acceptance of deep energy retrofit (DER) and broaden acceptance of its implementation using ESPCs for a comprehensive refurbishment of existing buildings.
机译:全世界许多国家的政府都为减少政府/公共建筑的能耗设定了更严格的目标。十多年前建造的建筑物在建筑存量消耗的能源中占很大比例。但是,用于业主指导的能源改造项目的资金和“专有技术”(应用知识)未能跟上新要求。对于典型的改造项目,能源消耗的减少在10%到20%之间,而全球已执行项目的经验表明,能源消耗的减少可以超过50%,并且经过翻新的建筑可以经济高效地达到被动房标准或甚至接近净零能耗状态(Hermelink和Mutter,2010; NBI 2014; RICS 2013; GreenBuildingAdvisor.com 2013; Shonder和Nasseri 2015; Miller和Higgins 2015; Emmerich等人2011)。根据国际能源机构的建筑物和社区能源计划(IEA EBC)附件46进行的先前研究确定并分析了建筑物翻新时可以使用的400多种节能措施。措施包括与建筑物围护结构,机械和照明系统,能源产生和分配以及内部过程有关的措施。采取一些单独的措施(如建筑物外墙保温,改善气密性和热电联产)可以显着降低建筑物的供暖和制冷负荷或将能源浪费降至最低,但需要大量投资并需要长期回收。但是,当有限数量的核心技术一起实施或捆绑在一起实施时,它们可以以较小的投资来显着减少能源消耗,从而提供更快的回报。在一些国家,节能绩效合同(ESPC)已被证明是实施能源改造项目的有效工具。但是,在许多国家,由ESPC资助的项目数量仍未占公共机构为能源改造预算的总投资的很大一部分。本文介绍了该概念和一些案例研究,这些案例说明了将提高对深层能源改造(DER)的接受程度并扩大使用ESPC对现有建筑物进行全面翻新的实施方式的接受程度的机制。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ASHRAE Transactions》 |2015年第2期|111-129|共19页
  • 作者单位

    U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Champaign, IL;

    Energy services development at Leiter Contracting, Karlsruhe, Germany;

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN;

    Federal Energy Management Program, U.S. Department of Energy;

    AEE-Institute for Sustainable Technologies, Gleisdorf, Austria;

    Cenergia Energy Consultants, Herlev, Denmark;

    VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号