首页> 外文期刊>ASHRAE Transactions >Gradient Descent for Multi-Objective Optimization to Find a Cohesive Solution for Fenestration Sizes
【24h】

Gradient Descent for Multi-Objective Optimization to Find a Cohesive Solution for Fenestration Sizes

机译:用于多目标优化的梯度下降,为更新尺寸找到一个凝聚力的解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Parametric Analysis (PA) have been used to optimize design solutions, they have been barely used to optimize complex design contexts that are multi-objective and multi-variable questions. In this study, I present the results of Gradient Descent (GD) optimization method to optimize skylight sizes by considering all the qualitative and quantitative factors, including daylight availability, glare and energy. The intent was to investigate the feasibility of applying GD for optimizing the average performance using an aggregated metric to represent all the three objectives. The target lighting level was considered 300 lux while Lighting Power Density (LPD) was held constant at 0.8 watt/ sqft for all iterations. GD method as applied to perform an unconstrained multi-objective optimization for the San Francisco climate. GD method results in 10.94% while PA method presents 11% as the inclusive optimal Skylight to Floor Ratio (SFR). Although GD method and PA reasonably agreed on the inclusive optimal SFRs, both methods required different numbers of iterations. Considering SFR resolution of 0.01%, for a Parametric Analysis 10,000 iterations would have been necessary. However, GD method required 5 iterations to find the optimal solution with higher SFR resolution of 0.01%. GD method shows a promisingfuture to apply in building industry to find an optimal solution for a complex design question in a reasonable amount of computing time.
机译:虽然遗传算法(GA)和参数分析(PA)已被用于优化设计解决方案,但它们几乎没有用于优化多目标和多变量问题的复杂设计上下文。在这项研究中,我介绍了梯度下降(GD)优化方法的结果,通过考虑所有定性和定量因素,包括日光可用性,眩光和能量来优化天窗尺寸。目的是调查应用GD以优化使用聚合度量来优化平均性能的可行性来代表所有三个目标。目标照明水平被认为是300勒克斯,而照明功率密度(LPD)在0.8瓦/平方英尺处保持恒定,以进行所有迭代。适用于对旧金山气候进行无约束多目标优化的GD方法。 GD方法导致10.94%,而PA方法呈现11%,作为包容性最佳天窗(SFR)。虽然GD方法和PA合理达成了包容性最佳SFR,但两种方法都需要不同数量的迭代。考虑到SFR分辨率为0.01%,对于参数分析,需要10,000次迭代。但是,GD方法需要5个迭代,以找到更高的SFR分辨率的最佳解决方案0.01%。 GD方法显示了在建筑行业中申请的承诺文件,以便在合理的计算时间中找到复杂的设计问题的最佳解决方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ASHRAE Transactions》 |2020年第1期|128-133|共6页
  • 作者

    Sara Motamedi;

  • 作者单位

    University of Texas at Austin and Interface Engineering in San Francisco Ca;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:40:46

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号