首页> 外文期刊>Army Logistician >Improving Materiel Readiness For The Joint Warfighter
【24h】

Improving Materiel Readiness For The Joint Warfighter

机译:改善联合作战人员的装备准备

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Seven years into the Global War on Terrorism, U.S. Armed Forces are decisively engaged in their longest period of sustained conflict since the Vietnam War. Joint logisticians are focused on providing world-class operational availability of systems to the warfighter and are constantly in pursuit of modernizing our military services. However, logisticians face two concerns with providing modern equipment. First, the cost to deliver this high level of system readiness remains unknown. Second, we in the Department of Defense (DOD) need to take an introspective look at how we make decisions to upgrade combat systems.rnFor example, the high-mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle has a 1975-vintage engine that could have been replaced in 1985 with a new, smaller engine that would have performed better, been more reliable, used less gas, and lasted longer. Two compelling reasons explain why DOD did not institute a fleet-wide upgrade. First, the acquisition and sustainment communities could not compellingly demonstrate a return on the investment. Second, it could be argued that the agencies responsible for funding this purchase had little interest or involvement with spiraling life-cycle costs.
机译:全球反恐战争已经过去了7年,美国武装部队果断地参与了越南战争以来最长的持续冲突时期。联合后勤人员致力于为作战人员提供世界一流的系统作战可用性,并不断追求现代化的军事服务。然而,后勤人员在提供现代设备时面临两个问题。首先,提供这种高水平的系统就绪性的成本仍然未知。其次,美国国防部(DOD)需要对我们如何决策升级战斗系统进行内省式研究。例如,高机动多用途轮式车辆的1975年老式发动机可以在1985年更换使用新的较小的发动机,性能会更好,更可靠,耗油量更少,使用寿命更长。有两个令人信服的理由解释了国防部为何不进行舰队级升级的原因。首先,收购和维持社区无法令人信服地证明投资回报。第二,可以争辩说,负责为此次购买提供资金的机构对生命周期成本的不断攀升几乎没有兴趣或参与。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Army Logistician》 |2009年第1期|40-42|共3页
  • 作者

    Eric McCoy;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号