首页> 外文期刊>Argumentation >Revolutionary Rhetoric: Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote” (1834) – A Case Study
【24h】

Revolutionary Rhetoric: Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote” (1834) – A Case Study

机译:革命性修辞学:格奥尔格·布希纳(GeorgBüchner)的“黑森州之地”(Der Hessische Landbote)(1834)-个案研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, the political pamphlet “Der Hessische Landbote” by the eminent German author, Georg Büchner (1813–1837), will be positioned within the context of its political and historical background, analyzed as to its argumentative and stylistic structure, and critically evaluated. It will be argued that propaganda texts such as this should be evaluated by taking into account both rhetorical perspectives and standards of rational discussion. As far as argumentative structure is concerned, a modified version of the Toulmin scheme will be used for the description of three passages of the “Landbote”. As far as stylistic techniques are concerned, Büchner’s strategic use of some figures of speech, especially parallelism, metaphor and metonymy will be examined. As to the critical evaluation, the recently developed concept of “strategic maneuvering” within Pragma-Dialectics, the typology of argumentative dialogues established by D. Walton, and sets of critical questions will be used to assess the status of the arguments within the “Landbote” as potentially fallacious ones.
机译:在本文中,德国著名作家乔治·布希纳(GeorgBüchner,1813–1837)的政治小册子“黑森州·兰博特(Der Hessische Landbote)”将置于其政治和历史背景的背景下,对其论据和文体结构进行分析,并且进行批判性分析。评估。有人认为,应该通过兼顾修辞学观点和理性讨论的标准来评估诸如此类的宣传文本。就论证结构而言,将使用Toulmin方案的修改版来描述“ Landbote”的三段。就文体技巧而言,将检查布希纳(Büchner)对某些修辞格的战略使用,尤其是平行性,隐喻和转喻。关于批判性评价,将使用实用主义-方言主义内部最近发展的“战略操纵”概念,D。Walton建立的辩论性对话的类型以及一系列关键性问题来评估“ Landbote”中辩论的状态”作为潜在的谬误。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号