首页> 外文期刊>Archives >ALLOTMENT GARDENS: RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND SURPRISING DISCOVERIES
【24h】

ALLOTMENT GARDENS: RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND SURPRISING DISCOVERIES

机译:配给花园:研究挑战和令人惊讶的发现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper documents how archives were used to write a history of the twentieth century urban allotment movement in England. Beginning with a case study of allotments in Ilford (now London Borough of Redbridge), it describes how 100 years of council minutes were used as a foundation to study a previously unresearched subject. Local Ilford Allotment Society archives were then examined, so that a more balanced perspective could be presented. In order to broaden the scope of this history, research then branched out to include legislation relating to allotments, and allotment holdings in the London Metropolitan and the Quaker archive, amongst others. The demographics of the plot holders in Ilford/Redbridge was profiled and showed that contrary to the established narrative, plot holders were not necessarily drawn from the poor and working classes but instead were reflective of the communities in which they lived. This paper further discusses the physical condition of archives in the possession of allotment societies and reflects on the difficulty of the conservation and security of those collections. It also questions the ethics of separating allotment society archives from their owners in order to safeguard them.
机译:本文记录了档案是如何被用来撰写英格兰20世纪城市分配运动的历史的。首先从Ilford(现为Redbridge伦敦自治市)的分配案例研究开始,它描述了如何使用100年的理事会会议记录作为研究以前未研究的主题的基础。然后检查了当地的伊尔福德分配协会档案,以便可以提出一个更加平衡的观点。为了拓宽这一历史的范围,随后开展了研究,以包括有关配发的法律,以及伦敦大都会和贵格会档案馆中的配给股份。对伊尔福德/雷德布里奇(Ilford / Redbridge)地块所有者的人口统计数据进行了分析,结果表明,与既定的叙述相反,地块所有者不一定来自贫穷和工人阶级,而是反映了他们所居住的社区。本文进一步讨论了拥有分配协会的档案馆的自然状况,并反思了这些馆藏的保存和安全困难。它还质疑将分配社会档案与所有者分开以保护档案的伦理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号