首页> 外文期刊>Architecture Australia >EPA Plan For Strict New Ammonia Water Criteria Draws Industry Worries
【24h】

EPA Plan For Strict New Ammonia Water Criteria Draws Industry Worries

机译:EPA严格的新氨水标准计划引起业界担忧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Epa is planning to drop a flexible, two-tiered approach for a new water quality criteria for ammonia that it is developing and will continue with its planned approach to set a strict new risk-based criteria that relies in part on harms to invasive species, an approach that is drawing significant concern from the wastewater treatment industry. In a recent letter to the agency, the industry says setting risk-based standards to protect invasive species appears inconsistent with the Clean Water Act (CWA) and calls on EPA to craft guidance for how to address the issue. In general, the agency crafts water quality criteria - risk-based concentrations of pollutants for protecting water quality - that are then used to set permit and other regulatory limits. EPA began revising its ammonia criteria in 2004, after the Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) presented EPA with new toxicity data for freshwater mussels that implied tighter criteria may be necessary. In 2009, the agency proposed a two-tiered approach for the criteria requiring waterbodies where freshwater mussels are present to have stricter limits than waters with no mussels.
机译:Epa计划放弃一种灵活的,分为两层的方法来制定其正在开发的氨水新水质标准,并将继续其计划中的方法来制定严格的基于风险的新标准,该标准部分取决于对入侵物种的危害,这种方法引起了废水处理行业的极大关注。在给该机构的最近一封信中,该行业表示,制定基于风险的标准来保护入侵物种似乎与《清洁水法》(CWA)不一致,并呼吁EPA就如何解决该问题制定指导。通常,该机构制定水质标准-基于风险的污染物浓度以保护水质-然后将其用于设置许可和其他法规限制。鱼类和野生动物服务局(FWS)向EPA提供了有关淡水贻贝的新毒性数据后,EPA于2004年开始修订其氨标准,这可能意味着可能需要更严格的标准。在2009年,该机构针对要求淡水贻贝比没有贻贝的水域有更严格限制的水体标准提出了两级方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号