首页> 外文期刊>Architectural theory review >RECLAIMING WHAT ARCHITECTURE DOES: TOWARD AN ETHOLOGY AND TRANSFORMATIVE ETHICS OF MATERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
【24h】

RECLAIMING WHAT ARCHITECTURE DOES: TOWARD AN ETHOLOGY AND TRANSFORMATIVE ETHICS OF MATERIAL ARRANGEMENTS

机译:修改架构的用途:实现材料布置的行为学和转换伦理学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accounting for historical formation as intensive formations of a material milieu amounts to nothing less than an ethical project. This paper proposes an etiological approach to architectural arrangements to overcome an impasse in the understanding of the built environment. In its central parts, it respectively revisits two favourite cliches of architectural theory: the Foucauldian dispositif (apparatus) and the Deleuzo-Guattarian agencement (assemblage). By reclaiming their different ontological conceptions of material arrangements, the paper challenges reductive readings of architectural apparatus and advance a more "machinic" reading of architecture. Therein, it proposes a tactical alliance with the flat, monist, and matter-oriented methodologies of such new-materialist theorists as Barad and Braidotti, that help reconsider its arrangements more ecosystemically as "embodied and embedded, relational and affective" figurations. Suggesting a clear theoretical challenge waiting to be taken up, the paper considers how architectural theory could advance such a radically productive conception of the built environment.
机译:将历史形成解释为物质环境的密集形成,无非是一项道德项目。本文提出了一种病因学方法来进行建筑布置,以克服对建筑环境的理解上的僵局。在其中心部分,它分别回顾了建筑理论的两个最受关注的时期:Foucauldian dispositif(装置)和Deleuzo-Guattarian机构(集合)。通过收回他们对材料安排的不同本体论概念,论文对建筑设备的还原性阅读提出了挑战,并推动了建筑的“机械化”阅读。在这里,它提出了与巴拉德和布雷多蒂这样的新唯物主义理论家的扁平化,一元论和面向问题的方法论的战术联盟,这有助于以“体现和嵌入,关系和情感”的形象更生态地重新考虑其安排。提出了一个尚待解决的明确的理论挑战,本文考虑了建筑理论如何推进这种对建筑环境的根本性生产概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号