【24h】

EDITORIALrn

机译:社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This issue of (?) developed out of a desire to reignite a creative and highly contemporary response to ecology in architecture. Over the last decade or so, there has been a real danger that the widespread adoption of sustainable codes and government policies has become a straitjacket for designers - an imposition rather than a productive force. It has become a matter of ticking off boxes for green building validation rather than engaging with wider ecological thinking and solutions.rnThe treatment of this theme was first propagated a couple of years back in New York through a conversation with guest-editor Lydia Kallipoliti. As a PhD candidate at Princeton University, Lydia Kallipoliti had developed an enthusiasm for the ecological content of (?) in the late 1960s and early 1970s, which was fuelled by her involvement in Beatriz Colomina's Clip/Stamp/Fold project on the radical small magazine. In the introduction to this issue, Kallipoliti describes how EcoRedux simultaneously draws inspiration from those pioneering days of ecological design in the early 1970s while developing a distinct stance and a clear set of its own preoccupations.
机译:本期(?)产生于重新点燃对建筑生态学的创造性和高度现代性回应的愿望。在过去的十年左右的时间里,存在着真正的危险,即可持续准则和政府政策的广泛采用已成为设计师的束缚,是一种强加于生产力的力量。这已经成为一个需要进行绿色建筑验证的问题,而不是进行更广泛的生态思考和解决方案。rn这个主题的处理方法最早是在几年前通过与来宾编辑Lydia Kallipoliti的对话在纽约传播的。 Lydia Kallipoliti作为普林斯顿大学的博士候选人,在1960年代末和1970年代初对(?)的生态含量产生了热情,这是由于她参与了Beatriz Colomina在激进的小型杂志上的Clip / Stamp / Fold项目的推动。在此问题的简介中,Kallipoliti描述了EcoRedux如何同时从1970年代初期生态设计的开创时代中汲取灵感,同时发展出独特的立场和明确的自己的关注点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Architectural Design》 |2010年第6期|p.5|共1页
  • 作者

    Helen Castle;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:27:43
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号