首页> 外文期刊>Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering >Stability Comparison of Fault Location Techniques Against Faulty GPS Time Tagging for Three-Terminal Lines
【24h】

Stability Comparison of Fault Location Techniques Against Faulty GPS Time Tagging for Three-Terminal Lines

机译:针对三端线GPS时间标记故障的定位技术的稳定性比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Fault location techniques based on the arrival times of Traveling Wave (TW) need precise time tagging and synchronization for multi-terminal transmission lines. Although this need can be satisfied by using Global Positioning System, extracting the correct arrival time of the main TW is a troubling task, especially for multi-terminal lines with large number of wave reflections in different directions after fault incident. So, stability of the proposed techniques should be studied when the time tagging has also faced faults. In this paper, three fault location techniques based on TW, Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) are discussed and then their stabilities against the faulty time tagging are compared. Simulation results show that three discussed methods have relatively close error averages. However, the proposed ANN-based method is twice much more stable than TW- and GA-based methods in about 22.95% of samples.
机译:基于行波(TW)到达时间的故障定位技术需要对多终端传输线进行精确的时间标记和同步。尽管可以通过使用全球定位系统满足此需求,但是提取主TW的正确到达时间是一项麻烦的任务,尤其是对于故障事件发生后在不同方向发生大量波反射的多终端线路而言。因此,当时间标记也面临故障时,应研究所提出技术的稳定性。本文讨论了基于TW,遗传算法(GA)和人工神经网络(ANN)的三种故障定位技术,然后比较了它们对故障时间标签的稳定性。仿真结果表明,所讨论的三种方法具有相对接近的误差平均值。但是,在大约22.95%的样本中,基于ANN的方法要比基于TW和GA的方法稳定两倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号