...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied solar energy >Comparison between Solar Distillers with and without Solar Concentrator
【24h】

Comparison between Solar Distillers with and without Solar Concentrator

机译:带和不带太阳能聚光器的太阳能蒸馏器的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In order to desalinate sea water by only solar energy using they were designed and built three distillers in which experimental measurements were taken to calculate production, performance and cost. Distillers by solar concentration are: a parabolic trough distiller (PTD) and a Fresnel linear distiller (FLD), and a stepped basin distiller (SBD). As a result, fresh water production under similar climatic conditions was 990 cm~3/m~2/day with an efficiency of 45.8% for the PTD, 855 cm~3/m~2/day with 38% of efficiency for the FLD and 5910 cm~3/m~2/day with an efficiency of 4.4% for the SBD. That is, although the SBD has 10 times lower efficiency than the PTD, it produces almost 6 times more fresh water per m~2 of distiller's surface. Regarding the cost of production of each liter of desalinated water, it was calculated in € 0.086, € 0.103 and € 0.034 for the PTD, FLD and SBD, respectively.
机译:为了仅使用太阳能使海水淡化,他们设计并建造了三个蒸馏器,在其中进行实验测量以计算生产,性能和成本。按太阳集中度计算的蒸馏器为:抛物线槽蒸馏器(PTD)和菲涅耳线性蒸馏器(FLD),以及阶梯式盆蒸馏器(SBD)。结果,在类似气候条件下的淡水产量为990 cm〜3 / m〜2 /天,PTD的效率为45.8%,855 cm〜3 / m〜2 /天的效率为FLD的38%和5910 cm〜3 / m〜2 /天,SBD的效率为4.4%。也就是说,尽管SBD的效率比PTD低10倍,但每m〜2的蒸馏器表面产生的淡水几乎高出6倍。关于每升淡化水的生产成本,PTD,FLD和SBD的计算成本分别为0.086欧元,0.103欧元和0.034欧元。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied solar energy 》 |2016年第2期| 131-136| 共6页
  • 作者

    E. Saettone; Y. Valencia;

  • 作者单位

    Institute of Scientific Research (IDIC), University of Lima, Peru;

    Institute of Scientific Research (IDIC), University of Lima, Peru;

  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号