首页> 外文期刊>Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback >Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
【24h】

Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting

机译:在行为中捉住欺骗者:在交互式采访中处理潜在的欺骗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
机译:说谎会引起压力和认知负担。两者都构成欺骗的线索,并导致交感神经系统(SNS)活动的增加。但是实际上,欺骗者大多数时候都坚持真理,只是偶尔撒谎。因此,本研究在一个互动的犯罪嫌疑人访谈环境中进行了研究,当欺骗者仅打算偶然撒谎时,欺骗者是否仍然与真相讲述者明显地存在着差异。我们发现,在SNS活动,自我报告的认知负担和压力方面,撒谎的骗子与真相讲述者一直存在差异。在所有访谈中,SNS活动与认知负荷自我报告的相关性强于压力,这支持了认知负荷方法。此外,欺骗者讲真话并且只对一个关键问题说谎,尤其是在讲真话者自我报告的压力方面存在分歧。在SNS活动和自我报告的认知负荷方面,未发现差异。讨论了理论和实践意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号