首页> 外文期刊>Applied physics. B, Lasers and optics >LIF measurements and chemical kinetic analysis of methylidyne formation in high-pressure counter-flow partially premixed and non-premixed flames
【24h】

LIF measurements and chemical kinetic analysis of methylidyne formation in high-pressure counter-flow partially premixed and non-premixed flames

机译:高压逆流部分预混和非预混火焰中亚甲基形成的LIF测量和化学动力学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We report quantitative, spatially resolved, linear laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) measurements of methylidyne concentration ([CH]) in laminar, methane-air, counter-flow partially premixed and non-premixed flames using excitation near 431.5 nm in the A-X (0, 0) band. For partially premixed flames, fuel-side equivalence ratios (φ_B) of 1.45, 1.6 and 2.0 are studied at pressures of 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 atm. For non-premixed flames, the fuel-side mixture consists of 25% CH_4 and 75% N_2; measurements are obtained at pressures of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 12 atm. The quantitative CH measurements are compared with predictions from an opposed-flow flame code utilizing two GRI chemical kinetic mechanisms (versions 2.11 and 3.0). LIF measurements of [CH] are corrected for variations in the quenching rate coefficient by using major species concentrations and temperatures generated by the code along with suitable quenching cross sections for CH available from the literature. A pathway analysis provides relative contributions from important elementary reactions to the total amount of CH produced at various pressures. Key reactions controlling peak CH concentrations are also identified by using a sensitivity analysis. For the partially premixed flames, measured CH profiles are reproduced reasonably well by GRI 3.0, although some quantitative disagreement exists at all pressures. Two CH radical peaks are observed for φ_B = 1.45 and φ_B = 1.6 at pressures above 3 atm. Peak CH concentrations for the non-premixed flames are significantly underpredicted by GRI 3.0. The latter agrees with previously reported NO concentrations, which are also under-predicted in these same high-pressure counter-flow diffusion flames.
机译:我们报告了在层流,甲烷空气,逆流部分预混和未预混火焰中使用AX在431.5 nm附近激发的定量,空间分辨,线性激光诱导的荧光(LIF)测量亚甲基浓度([CH]) 0,0)波段。对于部分预混火焰,在1、3、6、9和12 atm的压力下研究了1.45、1.6和2.0的燃料侧当量比(φ_B)。对于非预混火焰,燃料侧混合物由25%CH_4和75%N_2组成;在1、2、3、4、5、6、9和12 atm的压力下获得测量值。使用两个GRI化学动力学机制(版本2.11和3.0)将定量的CH测量值与对流火焰编码的预测值进行比较。通过使用代码产生的主要物质浓度和温度以及可从文献中获得的合适的CH猝灭截面,可以校正[CH]的LIF测量的猝灭速率系数的变化。途径分析提供了重要的基本反应对各种压力下生成的CH总量的相对贡献。通过使用敏感性分析还可以确定控制CH峰浓度的关键反应。对于部分预混火焰,尽管在所有压力下都存在一些定量分歧,但GRI 3.0可以很好地再现测得的CH曲线。在高于3个大气压的压力下,对于Φ_B= 1.45和Φ_B= 1.6,观察到两个CH自由基峰。非预混火焰的峰值CH浓度被GRI 3.0大大低估了。后者与先前报道的NO浓度一致,在这些相同的高压逆流扩散火焰中,NO浓度也被低估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号