首页> 外文期刊>Applied and environmental soil science >Assessing Soil Erosion by Agricultural and Forestry Production and Proposing Solutions to Mitigate: A Case Study in Son La Province, Vietnam
【24h】

Assessing Soil Erosion by Agricultural and Forestry Production and Proposing Solutions to Mitigate: A Case Study in Son La Province, Vietnam

机译:通过农业和林业生产评估土壤侵蚀并提出缓解方案:以越南松拉省为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Son La is a province in the Northwest region of Vietnam; this province has diverse terrains with elevation ranging from 100 m to 2,900 m. Due to lack of cultivating lands, farmers still cultivate lands with steep slope, even above 25°. Consequently, the soil erosion has occurred hugely and the time for productive cultivation has been shortened. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the actual soil erosion, analyzing causes and proposing solutions to mitigate soil loss in the Son La province. Application of GIS technology and the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) to predict soil erosion showed that the soil eroded at a very low level (0-1 ton·ha~(-1)·year~(-1)) accounted for the largest proportion with 56.49% of the area. Low level (1-5 ton·ha~(-1)·year~(-1)), medium level (5-10 ton·ha~(-1)·year~(-1)), and high level (10-50 ton·ha~(-1)·year~(-1)) eroded areas account for 8.52%, 7.88%, and 1.41%, respectively, of the area. Soil is eroded in very high level (>50 ton·ha~(-1)·year~(-1)), accounting for 25.7% of the study area. Research on solutions to mitigate soil erosion in Mai Son district showed that, for the cultivation of perennial crops (coffee), when planting on following contour lines, the amount of soil lost annually due to erosion is 63.37 ton·ha~(-1), while the cultivation following level top bench terrace soil loss is 39.55 ton·ha~(-1). If more grass strips were planted, the amount of soil lost annually due to erosion was reduced by 71% compared to traditional solutions. For this solution, when intercropping soybean, the soil erosion was reduced by 63-76% compared to the traditional methods. For cultivation of annual crops (maize) where the traditional methods of cultivation, namely, burning, ploughing, and seeding, are followed, the average loss of soil annually is 64.06 ton·ha~(-1). This value was 45.04 ton·ha~(-1) and 41.96 ton·ha~(-1), respectively, as the minimum soil tillage measure and no-tillage measure were used. When using the stems of maize after harvesting to cover lands following contour lines and terraces, soil erosion decreased by 38-59% compared to traditional solutions, while intercropping with legumes, soil loss due to erosion decreased 50-68% compared to traditional measures.
机译:Son La是越南西北地区的一个省;该省地形多样,海拔从100 m至2,900 m。由于缺乏耕地,农民仍然在陡峭的坡度上耕种土地,甚至在25°以上。因此,水土流失已发生很大,生产性耕种的时间缩短了。因此,有必要评估实际的土壤侵蚀,分析原因并提出解决方案以减轻Son La省的水土流失。 GIS技术和通用土壤流失方程(USLE)在预测土壤侵蚀中的应用表明,在非常低的水平(0-1吨·ha〜(-1)·年〜(-1))侵蚀的土壤是造成土壤侵蚀的主要原因。最大比例,占该地区的56.49%。低水平(1-5吨·公顷〜(-1)·年〜(-1)),中水平(5-10吨·公顷〜(-1)·年〜(-1))和高水平( 10-50吨·公顷〜(-1)·年〜(-1))的侵蚀面积分别占该地区的8.52%,7.88%和1.41%。土壤侵蚀程度很高(> 50吨·ha〜(-1)·年〜(-1)),占研究面积的25.7%。对麦山地区减轻水土流失的解决方案的研究表明,对于多年生作物(咖啡)的种植,按照以下等高线种植时,每年因水土流失造成的土壤流失量为63.37吨·ha〜(-1) ,高台梯田水土流失量为39.55 ton·ha〜(-1)。如果种植更多的草条,与传统的解决方案相比,每年因侵蚀而损失的土壤量减少了71%。对于这种解决方案,套种大豆时,与传统方法相比,土壤侵蚀减少了63-76%。一年生作物(玉米)的种植采用传统的燃烧,耕种和播种方法,每年平均土壤流失量为64.06吨·ha〜(-1)。作为最小耕作措施和免耕措施,该值分别为45.04 ton·ha〜(-1)和41.96 ton·ha〜(-1)。当使用收获后的玉米茎覆盖等高线和阶地的土地时,与传统的解决方案相比,土壤侵蚀减少了38-59%,而与豆类作物一起种植时,由于侵蚀造成的土壤流失与传统措施相比减少了50-68%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied and environmental soil science》 |2018年第2018期|2397265.1-2397265.10|共10页
  • 作者

    X. H. Nguyen; A. H. Pham;

  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Environmental Sciences (FES), VNU University of Science, 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam,Research Centre for Environmental Monitoring and Modelling (CEMM), VNU University of Science, 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam;

    Faculty of Environmental Sciences (FES), VNU University of Science, 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam,Research Centre for Environmental Monitoring and Modelling (CEMM), VNU University of Science, 334 Nguyen Trai Street, Thanh Xuan District, Hanoi, Vietnam;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号