首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies
【24h】

Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies

机译:审查建筑能源使用性能基准测试方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper is to review what kinds of mathematical methods used in developing benchmarking systems, to discuss the properties of the methods, and to classify two kinds of benchmarking systems based on their properties. We find that while benchmarking systems are developed by using the energy-use performance of a significant number of reference buildings, benchmarking results can be used to encourage poor reference performers (in energy-efficiency) to improve their performance. On the other hand, because benchmarking systems also function as a public yardstick of energy-use performance in buildings, some regulators release benchmarking information to the media. This proves advantageous because it brings public pressure on owners/developers of poorly performing non-reference buildings. However, not all benchmarking systems can be used by public users (i.e., other non-reference building owners). Depending on whether the resulting benchmarking system can be used in public, we note that there are two kinds of benchmarking system: public benchmarking and internal benchmarking. These two types of benchmarking system are developed by different methods.
机译:本文将回顾开发基准系统时使用的数学方法,讨论方法的性质,并根据它们的性质对两种基准系统进行分类。我们发现,虽然基准测试系统是通过使用大量参考建筑物的能源使用性能来开发的,但基准测试结果却可以用来鼓励表现不佳的参考人员(在能源效率方面)提高其性能。另一方面,由于基准测试系统还充当建筑物能源使用性能的公共标准,因此一些监管机构将基准测试信息发布给媒体。这被证明是有利的,因为它给表现不佳的非参考建筑的所有者/开发商带来了公共压力。但是,并非所有基准测试系统都可以由公共用户(即其他非参考建筑物所有者)使用。根据最终的基准系统是否可以在公共场所使用,我们注意到有两种基准系统:公共基准和内部基准。这两种类型的基准测试系统是通过不同的方法开发的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号