首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Different methods for the modelling of thermal bridges into energy simulation programs: Comparisons of accuracy for flat heterogeneous roofs in Italian climates
【24h】

Different methods for the modelling of thermal bridges into energy simulation programs: Comparisons of accuracy for flat heterogeneous roofs in Italian climates

机译:在能量模拟程序中将热桥建模的不同方法:在意大利气候中,平面异质屋顶的精度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Thermal bridges are weak areas of the building envelope, determining heat flows higher than those characterizing the common dispersing surfaces (i.e., walls without discontinuities). This phenomenon induces uncontrolled thermal losses and hygiene problems, connected to the possible vapor condensation and mold growth.Presently, the numerical codes for the energy audits, as, for instance, EnergyPlus, carry out zero-dimensional (indoor air) and one-dimensional (conduction heat transfer) analyses, approximately estimating the thermal bridge effects on the seasonal heating demand of buildings.In this paper, results obtained by means of the simplified 1-D models are compared to those obtained by more sophisticated models 2-D or 3-D, in order to point out differences in terms of equivalent conductivity and thermal transmittance. Then, dynamic simulations compare the outcomes in terms of seasonal energy consumption.A typical office building has been considered, analyzing - according to three different approaches - the thermal bridge represented by the roof structure. The outcomes, with reference to several Italian climates, show that a proper modelling is necessary. In particular, an over estimation of the heat losses, determined by an approximate evaluation, induces higher cost of refurbishing, higher cooling energy requests in summer, minor thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings.
机译:热桥是建筑围护结构的薄弱区域,因此确定的热流要高于表征普通分散表面(即不连续的墙)的热流。这种现象导致不受控制的热损失和卫生问题,与可能的蒸气凝结和霉菌生长有关。目前,能源审核的数字代码(例如EnergyPlus)执行零维(室内空气)和一维(传导热传递)分析,大致估算了热桥对建筑物季节性供暖需求的影响。在本文中,将通过简化的1-D模型获得的结果与通过更复杂的模型2-D或3获得的结果进行比较。 -D,以指出等效导电率和热透射率方面的差异。然后,通过动态模拟比较季节性能源消耗的结果。考虑了一种典型的办公楼,根据三种不同的方法分析了以屋顶结构为代表的热桥。根据意大利的几种气候,结果表明必须进行正确的建模。尤其是,通过近似评估确定的热量损失过高估计会导致翻新成本增加,夏季对冷却能量的要求更高,自然通风的建筑物的热舒适性降低。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2012年第2012期|p.405-418|共14页
  • 作者单位

    University ofSannio - DING, Department of Engineering, Piazza Roma, 21, 82100 Benevento, Italy;

    University of Naples Federico II - DETEC, Department of Energetics, Applied Thermofluidodinamics and Enviromental Conditioning, Piazzale Tecchio, 80, 80)25 Napoli, Italy;

    University ofSannio - DINC, Department of Engineering, Palazzo DeWAquila Bosco Lucarelli, Corso Garibaldi, 107, 82100 Benevento, Italy;

    University ofSannio - DING, Department of Engineering, Piazza Roma, 21, 82100 Benevento, Italy;

    University ofSannio - DING, Department of Engineering, Piazza Roma, 21, 82100 Benevento, Italy;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    building modelling; energy performance; thermal bridges; hourly energy simulation programs;

    机译:建筑模型;能源绩效;热桥;每小时能源模拟程序;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号