首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Performance evaluation and comparison of fuel processors integrated with PEM fuel cell based on steam or autothermal reforming and on CO preferential oxidation or selective methanation
【24h】

Performance evaluation and comparison of fuel processors integrated with PEM fuel cell based on steam or autothermal reforming and on CO preferential oxidation or selective methanation

机译:基于蒸汽或自热重整以及基于CO优先氧化或选择性甲烷化的与PEM燃料电池集成的燃料处理器的性能评估和比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The performances of four different auxiliary power unit (APU) schemes, based on a 5 kW_e net proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEM-FC) stack, are evaluated and compared. The fuel processor section of each APU is characterized by a reformer (autothermal ATR or steam SR), a non-isothermal water gas shift (NI-WGS) reactor and a final syngas catalytic clean-up step: the CO preferential oxidation (PROX) reactor or the CO selective methanation (SMET) one. Furthermore, three hydrocarbon fuels, the most commonly found in service stations (gasoline, light diesel oil and natural gas) are considered as primary fuels. The comparison is carried out examining the results obtained by a series of steady-state system simulations in Aspen Plus~® of the four different APU schemes by varying the fed fuel. From the calculated data, the performance of CO-PROX is not very different compared to that of the CO-SMET, but the performance of the SR based APUs is higher than the scheme of the ATR based APUs. The most promising APU scheme with respect to an overall performance target is the scheme fed with natural gas and characterized by a fuel processor chain consisting of SR, NI-WGS and CO-SMET reactors. This processing reactors scheme together with the fuel cell section, notwithstanding having practically the same energy efficiency of the scheme with SR, NI-WGS and CO-PROX reactors, ensures a less complex scheme, higher hydrogen concentration in the syngas, lower air mass rate consumption, the absence of nitrogen in the syngas and higher potential power of the stack anode exhaust. The stack anode exhaust, in fact, is recycled to the fuel processor section, thanks to the presence of methane produced in the final clean-up methanation reactor.
机译:评估并比较了基于5 kW_e净质子交换膜燃料电池(PEM-FC)堆栈的四种不同辅助动力装置(APU)方案的性能。每个APU的燃料处理器部分均具有重整器(自热ATR或蒸汽SR),非等温水煤气变换(NI-WGS)反应器和最终合成气催化净化步骤:CO优先氧化(PROX)反应器或CO选择性甲烷化(SMET)之一。此外,在加油站中最常见的三种烃燃料(汽油,轻柴油和天然气)被认为是主要燃料。通过检查通过改变进料燃料对四种不同的APU方案在AspenPlus®中进行的一系列稳态系统仿真所获得的结果,进行了比较。从计算的数据来看,CO-PROX的性能与CO-SMET的性能没有太大差异,但是基于SR的APU的性能高于基于ATR的APU的方案。就总体性能目标而言,最有希望的APU方案是采用天然气供气的方案,其特点是由SR,NI-WGS和CO-SMET反应堆组成的燃料处理器链。尽管该处理反应器方案与燃料电池部分一起具有与SR,NI-WGS和CO-PROX反应器方案几乎相同的能效,但可确保方案更简单,合成气中氢浓度更高,空气质量比更低消耗,合成气中不存在氮气以及烟囱阳极排气的更高潜在功率。实际上,由于在最终的清洁甲烷化反应器中产生了甲烷,因此将堆阳极废气再循环到燃料处理器部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号