...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Revisiting energy consumption and GDP causality: Importance of a priori hypothesis testing, disaggregated data, and heterogeneous panels
【24h】

Revisiting energy consumption and GDP causality: Importance of a priori hypothesis testing, disaggregated data, and heterogeneous panels

机译:重新审视能源消耗和GDP因果关系:先验假设检验,分类数据和异构面板的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper disaggregates energy consumption and GDP data according to end-use to analyze a broad number of developed and developing countries grouped in panels by similar characteristics. Panel long-run causality is assessed with a relatively under-utilized approach recommend by Canning and Pedroni (2008) [1]. We examine (i) reduced form production function models for both the industry and service/commercial sectors, where aggregate energy consumption is expected to cause aggregate output; and (ii) reduced form demand models, where income is expected to cause (separately) per capita residential electricity consumption and per capita gasoline consumption. We uncover for 12 different panels a set of super-consistent causality findings across two demand models that income "Granger-causes" per capita consumption. By contrast, the results from the production function models suggest that a different modeling framework is required to glean new, useful insights. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文根据最终用途对能源消耗和GDP数据进行了分类,以按相似的特征对许多发达国家和发展中国家进行分组。坎宁和佩德罗尼(2008)[1]建议采用相对未充分利用的方法来评估专家组的长期因果关系。我们研究(i)工业和服务/商业部门的简化形式生产函数模型,在这些模型中,总能耗预计会导致总产出; (ii)减少形式需求模型,其中收入预计会(分别)导致人均住宅用电量和人均汽油消耗。我们为12个不同的小组揭示了在两个人均消费收入“格兰杰因果”需求模型中的一组超一致因果关系发现。相比之下,生产函数模型的结果表明,需要不同的建模框架来收集新的有用的见解。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号