首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >A systematic comparison of different S-CO_2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants
【24h】

A systematic comparison of different S-CO_2 Brayton cycle layouts based on multi-objective optimization for applications in solar power tower plants

机译:基于多目标优化的不同S-CO_2布雷顿循环布局的系统比较,用于太阳能塔厂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Supercritical CO2 (S-CO2) Brayton cycles are recently proposed to be integrated into the solar power tower (SPT) due to their high efficiency and compactness. Comparison of different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts is of great significance for selecting a suitable one in the SPT plant. Both of the efficiency and specific work are important performance criteria for the SPT plant. However, previous studies compared only one individual criterion, or both of them just separately. This paper puts forward a systematic comparison of different S-CO2 cycle layouts by comparing the Pareto optimal fronts obtained from multi-objective optimizations. The results suggest that the inter-cooling cycle layout and the partial-cooling cycle layout can generally yield the most excellent performances, and followed by the recompression cycle layout and the pre-compression cycle layout, while the simple recuperation cycle layout has the worst performances. The advantages of the partial-cooling cycle layout and the inter-cooling cycle layout are more prominent compared with the other cycle layouts in the case of high compressor inlet temperature. The provided systematic comparison can be helpful in selecting the most suitable cycle layout for the application in SPT when there are specified requirements for the efficiency and the specific work. In addition, novel salts with high upper limit temperature (higher than 650 degrees C) are recommended to be developed as the heat transfer fluid for improving system performances.
机译:由于超临界二氧化碳(S-CO2)的高效和紧凑性,最近提出将布雷顿循环集成到太阳能塔(SPT)中。比较不同的S-CO2布雷顿循环布局对于在SPT工厂中选择合适的布局具有重要意义。效率和具体工作都是SPT工厂的重要性能标准。但是,以前的研究仅比较了一个单独的标准,或者两个都单独比较。通过比较从多目标优化获得的帕累托最优前沿,本文提出了不同S-CO2循环布局的系统比较。结果表明,中间冷却循环布局和部分冷却循环布局通常可以产生最佳性能,其次是再压缩循环布局和预压缩循环布局,而简单的换热循环布局则表现最差。 。在压缩机入口温度较高的情况下,与其他循环布置相比,部分冷却循环布置和中间冷却循环布置的优势更加突出。当对效率和特定工作有特定要求时,所提供的系统比较可以帮助为SPT中的应用选择最合适的循环布局。此外,建议开发具有较高上限温度(高于650摄氏度)的新型盐作为传热流体,以改善系统性能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2018年第15期|109-121|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Minist Educ, Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Minist Educ, Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Minist Educ, Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Minist Educ, Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Minist Educ, Key Lab Thermofluid Sci & Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Solar power tower; Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles; Molten salt; Systematic comparison; Multi-objective optimization;

    机译:太阳能塔;超临界CO2布雷顿循环;熔盐;系统比较;多目标优化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号