...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide
【24h】

Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide

机译:两种催化过程综合分析,从二氧化碳中生产甲酸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Carbon utilization (CU) based formic acid (FA) process is a promising option to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) causing global warming but energy intensive resulting in a negative income effect on energy consumption. In the literature, catalytic conversion of CO2 to FA at low concentrations is focused and limited to recovery of FA with a high purity. This study presents two commercial-scale processes for catalytic production of formic acid (FA) from CO2, and conducts economic, energy and environmental analysis of them. Process B that uses an Au/TiO2 catalyst has a higher conversion by 3 mol% to 84 mol% than Process A that uses a Ru-Ph catalyst. Moreover, after catalytic conversion of CO2, Process B uses an additional amine shift reaction to recover FA with low energy consumption. Simulation of process design including CO2 conversion and separation of FA shows that Process B has a higher energy efficiency by 24.3% to 69.0% compared to Process A. However, Process A has a much lower reaction time (T-R) than Process B, so the minimum selling price of FA (US$ 1,029/t(FA)) for Process A is more cost-competitive than Process B (US$ 1,037/t(FA)) with the current petroleum-based approach. In contrast, environmental analyses show that Process B has a higher potential by 0.3 t(CO2)/t(FA) to reduce CO2 emissions. If feasible positive assumptions (reduced T-R; received carbon credits) can be met, Process B will also be techno-economically viable.
机译:基于碳利用(Cu)的甲酸(FA)方法是减少二氧化碳(CO2)引起全球变暖,但能量密集导致能量消耗产生负收入影响的有前途的选择。在文献中,在低浓度下的CO 2至Fa的催化转化集中并限制为具有高纯度的Fa的回收率。本研究提出了两种用于来自CO2的含甲酸(FA)的商业规模方法,并进行它们的经济,能量和环境分析。使用Au / TiO 2催化剂的方法B比使用Ru-pH催化剂的方法A更高的转化率3mol%至84mol%。此外,在CO 2的催化转化后,方法B使用额外的胺变化反应以恢复具有低能量消耗的FA。与工艺A相比,工艺设计包括CO2转化和分离的过程设计模拟表明该方法B的能量效率为24.3%至69.0%。然而,工艺A具有比工艺B更低的反应时间(TR),所以FA(1,029 / t(FA))的最低销售价格对于过程A比工艺B(1,037美元(FA))与当前的石油为基础的方法更具成本竞争力。相比之下,环境分析表明,该方法B具有较高的电位0.3 T(CO2)/ T(FA)以减少二氧化碳排放。如果可以满足可行的积极假设(减少T-R;收到的碳信用),过程B也将是技术 - 经济上可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号