首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of liquid fuel production on aircraft carriers
【24h】

Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of liquid fuel production on aircraft carriers

机译:航空母舰上液体燃料生产的技术,经济和环境评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The supply chain to deliver fuels to aircraft carriers is complex, dangerous, and expensive, and one option to mitigate these risks is to produce fuel at sea. This work quantifies the costs, climate impacts, and physical characteristics of three technology pathways for fuel production onboard aircraft carriers: alkaline electrolysis and reverse water gas shift (AE + RWGS); solid oxide electrolysis and RWGS (SOEC + RWGS); and co-electrolysis of steam and CO2. Two design scenarios are evaluated: a small, infrequently operating plant using excess nuclear power (Scenario A); and a large, frequently operating plant with dedicated nuclear capacity (Scenario B). Fuel production costs are quantified using a Monte Carlo techno-economic analysis, ranging from 1.91 to 4.49 and 3.25-4.23 $/L in Scenarios A and B, respectively. The lowest cost technology pathway is AE + RWGS. All technology pathways are shown to offer reductions in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 82-86% relative to petroleum JP-5. In Scenario B, the plant volume and weight are estimated at 50-67% and 432% of current aircraft carrier designs, respectively, highlighting challenges for technical feasibility. Furthermore, increasing plant production capacity and capacity factor is shown to reduce the unit cost of fuel production, but that this is largely offset by the additional costs of dedicated nuclear capacity required at larger scales. The results indicate that fuel production on an aircraft carrier may be technically feasible, cost competitive, and environmentally beneficial relative to the petroleum fuels currently in use. However, research to further reduce system cost, weight, and volume, including experimental validation, are still required.
机译:将燃料输送到航空母舰的供应链是复杂,危险且昂贵的,减轻这些风险的一种选择是在海上生产燃料。这项工作量化了航空母舰上燃料生产的三种技术途径的成本,气候影响和物理特性:碱性电解和反向水煤气变换(AE + RWGS);固体氧化物电解和RWGS(SOEC + RWGS);蒸汽和二氧化碳的共电解。对两个设计方案进行了评估:一个使用多余核电的小型,不经常运行的工厂(方案A);以及具有专用核能的大型且经常运行的工厂(方案B)。使用蒙特卡洛技术经济分析来量化燃料生产成本,在方案A和B中,燃料生产成本分别为1.91至4.49和3.25-4.23 $ / L。成本最低的技术途径是AE + RWGS。与石油JP-5相比,所有技术途径的生命周期温室气体排放量均减少了82-86%。在方案B中,工厂的体积和重量估计分别为当前航空母舰设计的50-67%和432%,这突出了技术可行性方面的挑战。此外,增加工厂的生产能力和容量因子已显示出可减少燃料生产的单位成本,但这在很大程度上被大规模规模所需的专用核能的额外成本所抵消。结果表明,相对于当前使用的石油燃料,航空母舰上的燃料生产在技术上是可行的,具有成本竞争力,并且对环境有利。但是,仍需要进一步降低系统成本,重量和体积的研究,包括实验验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号