首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Comparison of subsidy schemes for carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) investment based on real option approach: Evidence from China
【24h】

Comparison of subsidy schemes for carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) investment based on real option approach: Evidence from China

机译:基于实物期权方法的碳捕集利用与封存(CCUS)投资补贴方案比较:来自中国的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study adopts the real option approach to compare the impacts of different subsidy schemes, including initial investment subsidy, electricity tariff subsidy, and CO2 utilization subsidy, on the investment benefit of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) project in China under high, medium, and low coal price levels, respectively. The results show that: (1) Under the current oil price level (70 USD/bbl), CO2 utilization subsidy referring to the 45Q Tax Credit released by the US government is high enough to trigger the investment behavior immediately. However, the full initial investment subsidy needs to be replenished with other ways and the electricity tariff subsidy needs to increase by 2.6 times compared with the current subsidy for renewable energy (0.019 CNY/kWh). (2) The critical oil prices under full investment subsidy and electricity tariff subsidy need to increase by at least 2.7% and 14.1%, respectively. (3) Both electricity tariff subsidy and CO2 utilization subsidy are feasible, while the former need to exceed the current subsidy for renewable energy and the latter is more favorable in promoting the development of full-chain CCUS project and the increase of oil production. (4) The optimal investment timing can be brought forward to 2023 if the technological learning rate reaches 30% under the low coal price level; the investors should abandon the project until the technological learning rates reach 5% and 10% under the medium and high coal price levels, respectively. Overall, our results enable to provide useful information for the policy-makers to formulate subsidy policies.
机译:本研究采用实物期权方法,比较了高,中,低档期初投资补贴,电价补贴和二氧化碳利用补贴等不同补贴方案对我国碳捕集利用与封存(CCUS)项目投资效益的影响。 ,以及较低的煤炭价格水平。结果表明:(1)在当前油价水平(70美元/桶)下,美国政府发布的45Q税收抵免政策对二氧化碳利用的补贴足够高,可以立即触发投资行为。但是,需要用其他方式补充全部的初始投资补贴,电价补贴需要比目前的可再生能源补贴(0.019元/ kWh)提高2.6倍。 (2)全额投资补贴和电价补贴下的临界油价至少需要分别上涨2.7%和14.1%。 (3)电价补贴和二氧化碳利用补贴都是可行的,而前者需要超过目前的可再生能源补贴,后者更有利于促进CCUS全链项目的发展和石油产量的增加。 (4)如果在低煤价水平下技术学习率达到30%,则可以将最佳投资时机提前至2023年;投资者应放弃该项目,直到在中高煤价水平下技术学习率分别达到5%和10%为止。总体而言,我们的结果能够为决策者制定补贴政策提供有用的信息。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Applied Energy》 |2019年第1期|113828.1-113828.12|共12页
  • 作者单位

    CUGB Sch Econ & Management Beijing 100083 Peoples R China|Minist Land & Resources Peoples Republ China Key Lab Resources & Environm Capac Beijing 100083 Peoples R China;

    CUMTB Sch Resources & Safety Engn Beijing 100083 Peoples R China;

    Beijing Inst Technol Sch Management & Econ Beijing 100081 Peoples R China;

    Minist Sci & Technol Adm Ctr Chinas Agenda 21 Beijing 100038 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    CCUS; Initial investment subsidy; Electricity tariff subsidy; CO2 utilization subsidy; Real option;

    机译:CCUS;初期投资补贴;电费补贴;二氧化碳利用补贴;实物期权;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号