首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Evaluation of cost-effective building retrofit strategies through soft-linking a metamodel-based Bayesian method and a life cycle cost assessment method
【24h】

Evaluation of cost-effective building retrofit strategies through soft-linking a metamodel-based Bayesian method and a life cycle cost assessment method

机译:通过软链接基于元模型的贝叶斯方法和生命周期成本评估方法,评估具有成本效益的建筑改造策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The building sector contributes a major proportion of the global energy consumptions and carbon emissions. The energy performance or efficiency of buildings can be improved through a wide range of retrofitting measures which can have very different costs. Under budget, time and other resource constraints, it is not practical to apply all energy saving measures to a given retrofitting project. As such, there is a need to rank and select the most cost-effective measures to meet efficiency improvement goals. Traditionally, energy efficiency improvement measures and their costs are evaluated separately which makes prioritising among the measures difficult. In response, an integrated approach by soft-linking a metamodel-based Bayesian method and a life cycle cost assessment method is proposed to rank and select the most cost-effective retrofitting measures. The metamodel-based method is used to compute building energy consumptions before and after retrofit; and the cost-assessment method is used to evaluate the life cycle cost of implementing each measure. A selection of nine retrofitting measures are ranked according to life cycle energy savings, life cycle cost, and cost-effectiveness (measured by cost per unit energy saved). Findings from the Singapore case study suggest that retrofitting building envelop is the third least cost-effective measure although it can lead to highest energy savings. Lighting replacement has the least life cycle energy savings, but it is the most cost-effective measure. Electricity price has little influence on the cost-effectiveness ranking of all nine measures but discount rates (tested for 4%, 7% and 12%) can influence the ranking of home appliances. Based on the findings from the case study, the proposed integrated approach can help identify an optimum retrofit strategy and the cost of achieving energy efficiency targets for existing buildings.
机译:建筑部门在全球能源消耗和碳排放中占很大比例。建筑物的能源性能或效率可以通过各种各样的改造措施来提高,这些措施的成本可能相差很大。在预算,时间和其他资源限制下,将所有节能措施应用于给定的改造项目是不切实际的。因此,有必要对最有成本效益的措施进行排名和选择,以达到提高效率的目标。传统上,提高能效的措施及其成本是分开评估的,这使得在措施之间进行优先排序变得困难。作为响应,提出了一种通过将基于元模型的贝叶斯方法和生命周期成本评估方法进行软链接的集成方法,以对最经济的改造措施进行排名和选择。基于元模型的方法用于计算改造前后的建筑能耗。成本评估方法用于评估实施每种措施的生命周期成本。根据生命周期的节能量,生命周期的成本和成本效益(按每单位节省的能量的成本来衡量)对九种改造措施进行选择。新加坡案例研究的结果表明,改造建筑围护结构是成本效益最低的措施,尽管它可以带来最高的节能效果。更换照明设备可以节省最少的生命周期能源,但这是最具成本效益的措施。电价对所有九项措施的成本效益排名几乎没有影响,但是折扣率(经测试分别为4%,7%和12%)可以影响家用电器的排名。根据案例研究的结果,建议的集成方法可以帮助确定最佳的改造策略以及为现有建筑物实现节能目标的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号