...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Economics >Self-selection and the power of incentive schemes: an experimental study
【24h】

Self-selection and the power of incentive schemes: an experimental study

机译:自我选择与激励机制的力量:一项实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine how self-selection of workers depends on the power of incentive schemes and how it affects team performance if the power of the incentive schemes is increased. In a laboratory experiment, we let subjects choose between (low-powered) team incentives and (high-powered) individual incentives. We observe that subjects exhibiting high trust or reciprocity in the trust game are more likely to choose team incentives. When exposed to individual incentives, subjects who chose team incentives perform worse if both the unobservable interdependency between their efforts and their incentive to cooperate under team incentives are high.View full textDownload full textKeywordsincentive scheme, self-selection, laboratory experiment, trust, reciprocityJEL ClassificationC91, J33, M52Related var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.587787
机译:我们研究了工人的自我选择如何取决于激励机制的力量,以及如果激励机制的力量增加,它会如何影响团队绩效。在实验室实验中,我们让受试者在(低动力)团队激励和(高动力)个人激励之间进行选择。我们观察到,在信任博弈中表现出高度信任或互惠的主体更有可能选择团队激励。当暴露于个人激励下时,如果团队激励下的努力与合作激励之间不可观察的相互依存性很高,则选择团队激励的受试者表现会更差。查看全文下载全文关键词激励方案,自我选择,实验室实验,信任,互惠性,J33,M52相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b” };添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.587787

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号