首页> 外文期刊>Applied Cognitive Psychology >Gaining insight into long-term effects of inviting speculation: Does recantation help?†
【24h】

Gaining insight into long-term effects of inviting speculation: Does recantation help?†

机译:深入了解引发投机的长期影响:朗诵有帮助吗?†

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The effects of speculation on delayed recall and on source monitoring (SM) as a recantation device were examined in first and fourth graders. Two weeks after a clown show, the speculation group recalled all actions and speculated on half. The control group recalled all actions without speculating. One month and 6 months later, all children recalled all actions. Half the children were given the opportunity to recant at 1 month and all children at 6 months. Even after 6 months, speculation negatively impacted recall. Only first-graders' script-consistent false responses increased with time. In the speculation group, 19% of previously given script-consistent speculations were recanted after 1 month and 20% after 6 months. Older children were better at recanting than younger children. Although recantation via SM immediately after 6-month recall had a positive effect, SM at 1 month had no prospective effect on 6-month recall. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:在一年级和四年级学生中检查了投机对延迟召回和作为朗诵设备的源监控(SM)的影响。一场小丑表演后的两周,投机者召回了所有行动,并猜测了一半。对照组召回了所有行动,没有进行推测。一个月零六个月后,所有儿童都回忆起所有行动。一半的孩子有机会在1个月时退缩,所有的孩子都在6个月时退出。即使在6个月后,投机活动也对召回产生负面影响。随着时间的流逝,只有一年级学生的脚本一致错误反应会增加。在推测组中,先前给出的脚本一致推测的19%在1个月后被拒绝,而20%在6个月后被拒绝。大一点的孩子比小一点的孩子更容易背诵。尽管在6个月的召回后立即通过SM撤回有积极效果,但1个月的SM对6个月的召回没有前瞻性影响。版权所有©2009 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号