首页> 外文期刊>Applied Cognitive Psychology >Turning a blind eye to double blind line-ups
【24h】

Turning a blind eye to double blind line-ups

机译:视而不见双盲阵容

获取原文
       

摘要

Although psychologists have urged police officers to use double blind line-up procedures during their investigations, police officers state that these would be difficult to administer and most have been reluctant to implement this change. Four studies examine whether lay people's judgements about the guilt of a suspect vary according to whether a brief written summary of a case described the identification procedure as double blind or non-double blind. The effects were all small (and almost all non-significant). Most people do not treat double blind line-ups differently from non-double blind line-ups when assessing the guilt of a defendant. Either police investigators should stop using this biased method or police investigators and others in the judicial system (e.g. jurors, judges) should be informed of this bias when evaluating results from any line-up. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:尽管心理学家敦促警官在调查过程中使用双盲排队程序,但警官指出,这些程序难以管理,而且大多数人都不愿实施这一变更。有四项研究根据对案件的简短书面总结将鉴定程序描述为双盲还是非双盲的方法,研究了外行人对嫌疑人有罪的判断是否有所不同。影响都很小(几乎几乎没有影响)。在评估被告的有罪感时,大多数人不会像对待非双盲选手那样对待双盲选手。评估任何阵容的结果时,要么警察调查人员应停止使用这种偏见方法,要么应将司法调查人员和司法系统中的其他人员(例如陪审员,法官)告知这种偏见。版权所有©2009 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号