首页> 外文期刊>Applied Cognitive Psychology >Holistic Versus Featural Facial Composite Systems for People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities
【24h】

Holistic Versus Featural Facial Composite Systems for People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities

机译:轻度智力障碍者的整体与面部面部复合系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Limited verbal abilities might act as a barrier to witnesses with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) to provide accurate testimony. This might be particularly problematic when the police need to create a facial composite image. Contrary to featural composite systems such as Electronic Facial Identification Technique (E-FIT), holistic systems such as Evolutionary Facial Identification Technique (EvoFIT) do not require the witness to provide a verbal description of a perpetrator's face. Instead, they rely more on face recognition, which may make them more suitable for people with ID. The current study compared the performance of people with and without ID at creating composites using E-FIT and EvoFIT. Although ID composites created with EvoFIT were more often accurately identified than E-FIT composites, the performance of ID participants was overall very poor across both systems and considerably poorer than that of non-ID participants. The implications of these findings for practitioners working in the Criminal Justice System are discussed. Copyright ? 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:语言能力有限可能会阻碍智障证人提供准确的证词。当警察需要创建面部合成图像时,这可能尤其成问题。与诸如电子面部识别技术(E-FIT)之类的自然合成系统相反,诸如进化面部识别技术(EvoFIT)之类的整体系统不需要证人提供犯罪者面部的口头描述。相反,他们更多地依赖面部识别,这可能使它们更适合具有ID的人。当前的研究比较了有和没有ID的人在使用E-FIT和EvoFIT创建复合材料时的性能。尽管使用EvoFIT创建的ID合成物比使用E-FIT合成物更容易识别,但在两个系统中,ID参与者的表现总体上非常差,并且比非ID参与者更差。讨论了这些发现对在刑事司法系统中工作的从业者的意义。版权? 2012年John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号