...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied clay science >Soil mineralogy effects on seal formation, runoff and soil loss
【24h】

Soil mineralogy effects on seal formation, runoff and soil loss

机译:土壤矿物学对海豹形成,径流和土壤流失的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Interaction between clay particles is one of the main factors responsible for soil aggregation. Therefore, soil mineralogy, which has substantial effects on clay dispersion, may also influence aggregate stability, seal formation, runoff and soil loss. In spite of this, the effects of soil mineralogy on these phenomena have received much less attention in the literature than those of other soil properties. This paper reviews the effects of soil mineralogy on aggregate stability, seal formation and micromorphology, and on the associated infiltration rate (IR), runoff and soil loss. The paper is focused mainly on the authors' previous studies. In order to determine these effects, various soils with different mineralogy were collected from Israel, South Africa and Kenya. In these soils, the aggregate stability was determined under fast wetting conditions, and the IR and the intcrrill soil loss were determined using rainfall simulator of a rotating disk type. The micromorphology of the crust, which was developed at the soil surface by the rainstorm, was determined by scanning electron microscope. Clay mineralogy was found to be a dominant factor in controlling aggregate stability, seal formation, soil IR and intertill soil loss. The phyllosilicate soils, which were review in this paper, were divided into two main groups: (ⅰ) stable soils with final IR>8.0 mm h~(-1) and (ⅱ) unstable soils with final IR < 4.5 mm h~(-1). These two soil groups differ in their mineralogy. Kaolinitic and illitic soils that do not contain smectite were stable soils and less susceptible to seal formation. In contrast, kaolinitic and illitic soils that contain some smectite and smectitic soils were unstable. Examination of the susceptibility of 21 phyllosilicate soils to intertill erosion indicated that these soils could be divided into three groups. Soil loss was higher for unstable soils than for stable soils, but the soil loss of the smectitic soils was significantly higher than that of the unstable soils, which contained kaolinite or illite as the dominant clay. P 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:粘土颗粒之间的相互作用是造成土壤聚集的主要因素之一。因此,对粘土分散有实质性影响的土壤矿物学也可能影响骨料的稳定性,密封形成,径流和土壤流失。尽管如此,与其他土壤特性相比,土壤矿物学对这些现象的影响在文献中受到的关注要少得多。本文综述了土壤矿物学对骨料稳定性,密封形成和微观形态以及相关的入渗速率(IR),径流和土壤流失的影响。本文主要集中于作者以前的研究。为了确定这些影响,从以色列,南非和肯尼亚收集了具有不同矿物学特征的各种土壤。在这些土壤中,在快速润湿条件下确定了骨料的稳定性,并使用转盘式降雨模拟器确定了IR和土壤的内部损失。通过扫描电子显微镜确定了由于暴雨在土壤表面形成的地壳的微观形态。发现粘土矿物学是控制团聚体稳定性,密封形成,土壤IR和耕作土壤流失的主要因素。本文综述的层状硅酸盐土壤分为两大类:(ⅰ)最终IR> 8.0 mm h〜(-1)的稳定土壤和(ⅱ)最终IR <4.5 mm h〜(-)的不稳定土壤。 -1)。这两个土壤组的矿物学不同。不含蒙脱石的高岭土和非法土是稳定的土壤,不易形成海豹。相反,含有一些蒙脱石的高岭土和硅藻土和蒙脱石土壤是不稳定的。对21种页硅酸盐土壤间作侵蚀的敏感性研究表明,这些土壤可分为三类。不稳定土壤的土壤流失要比稳定土壤高,但近土型土壤的土壤流失要明显高于以高岭石或伊利石为主要粘土的不稳定土壤。 P 2003 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号