首页> 外文期刊>Applied Artificial Intelligence >COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES OF EVENT BAYESIAN NETWORKS: A CASE STUDY
【24h】

COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES OF EVENT BAYESIAN NETWORKS: A CASE STUDY

机译:两种事件贝叶斯网络的比较:一个案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Temporal Nodes Bayesian Networks (TNBNs) and Networks of Probabilistic Events in Discrete Time (NPEDTs) are two different types of Event Bayesian Networks (EBNs). Both are based on the representation of uncertain events, alternatively to Dynamic Bayesian Networks, which deal with real-world dynamic properties. In a previous work, Arroyo-Figueroa and Sucar applied TNBNs to the diagnosis and prediction of the temporal faults that may occur in the steam generator of a fossil power plant. We present an NPEDT for the same domain, along with a comparative evaluation of the two networks. We examine different methods suggested in the literature for the evaluation of Bayesian networks, analyze their limitations when applied to this temporal domain, and suggest a new evaluation method appropriate for EBNs. In general, the results show that, in this domain, NPEDTs perform better than TNBNs, possibly due to finer time granularity used in the NPEDT.
机译:时间节点贝叶斯网络(TNBN)和离散时间概率事件网络(NPEDT)是两种不同类型的事件贝叶斯网络(EBN)。两者均基于不确定事件的表示,或者基于动态贝叶斯网络,后者处理现实世界中的动态属性。在先前的工作中,Arroyo-Figueroa和Sucar将TNBN应用于诊断和预测化石发电厂的蒸汽发生器中可能发生的暂时性故障。我们提出了针对同一域的NPEDT,以及对这两个网络的比较评估。我们检查了文献中提出的用于贝叶斯网络评估的不同方法,分析了将其应用于时域的局限性,并提出了适用于EBN的新评估方法。通常,结果表明,在该域中,NPEDT的性能优于TNBN,这可能是由于NPEDT中使用的时间粒度更小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号