...
首页> 外文期刊>APICS >Taking the temptation out of maverick spending
【24h】

Taking the temptation out of maverick spending

机译:从特立独行的支出中消除诱惑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Has your sourcing department ever mandated the use of a national contract to buy an item at a certain price when that same product seemed to be less expensive at a local store? It probably happens fairly regularly. It is certainly a source of frustration for employees in the field, who feel as if this is an example of higher-ups undermining local budgets. On the surface, this frustration seems valid, but a closer look at all the costs involved in the acquisition and use of those products and services likely would result in a different conclusion altogether. This closer examination is often referred to as all-in-cost, true cost, or total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis.
机译:当您的采购部门在本地商店看起来价格便宜时,您的采购部门是否曾曾要求使用国家合同以一定价格购买某件商品?它可能相当定期地发生。对于现场员工而言,这无疑是一个沮丧的源头,他们觉得这似乎是上级领导破坏当地预算的一个例子。从表面上看,这种挫折似乎是合理的,但是仔细研究购买和使用这些产品和服务所涉及的所有成本,可能会得出完全不同的结论。这种仔细检查通常称为全成本,真实成本或总拥有成本(TCO)分析。

著录项

  • 来源
    《APICS》 |2005年第9期|p.28-32|共5页
  • 作者

    LEE S. CRANE;

  • 作者单位

    U.S. Postal Service;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 管理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号