...
首页> 外文期刊>The Antitrust Bulletin >The law and economics of de facto exclusive dealing
【24h】

The law and economics of de facto exclusive dealing

机译:事实排他性交易的法律和经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Firms employ numerous membership and loyalty policies to persuade customers to purchase exclusively from them. These membership and loyalty policies can take the form of volume discounts, bundled pricing, cash back, or dividends which are either conditioned on the purchase of memberships or on the total volume purchased. When such membership and loyalty policies are enacted by firms in a competitive market, the procompetitive benefits are clear. However, when these policies are enacted by a monopolist the effects can be pernicious because membership and loyalty policies create de facto exclusive arrangements. Monopolists can thus use these policies to foreclose a market to new entrants or to drive out small competitors. Despite the potential anticompetitive effect of these policies, it is unclear whether the antitrust laws should prosecute policies such as these and if so whether the courts would find them unlawful. The boundary that separates legitimate from unlawful monopoly behavior is a fuzzy, shifting line and remains among the most highly contested issues in antitrust law today.
机译:公司采用许多会员资格和忠诚度政策说服客户从他们那里独家购买商品。这些会员资格和忠诚度政策可以采取批量折扣,捆绑定价,现金返还或股息的形式,这些折扣取决于会员资格的购买或购买的总数量。当公司在竞争性市场中制定此类成员资格和忠诚度政策时,竞争优势显而易见。但是,当这些政策由垄断者制定时,其后果可能是有害的,因为会员制和忠诚度政策会创建事实上的排他性安排。因此,垄断者可以使用这些政策来阻止新进入者进入市场或驱逐小的竞争者。尽管这些政策具有潜在的反竞争影响,但尚不清楚反托拉斯法是否应起诉此类政策,如果是,法院是否会认为这些政策不合法。将合法行为与非法垄断行为区分开来的界限是一条模糊的,不断变化的界线,并且仍然是当今反托拉斯法中争议最大的问题之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号