首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Operations Research >Total factor productivity growth and directions of technical change bias: evidence from 99 OECD and non-OECD countries
【24h】

Total factor productivity growth and directions of technical change bias: evidence from 99 OECD and non-OECD countries

机译:全要素生产率增长和技术变化偏向的方向:来自99个经合组织和非经合组织国家的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Based on data of 99 nations during 1991-2003, the Malmquist index and its composition of technical change and efficiency change are estimated. In particular, the hypothesis of neutral technology is released to divide technology into the magnitude of the shift in the world production frontier and input-biased technology, and to show that in order to gain more benefit or not to lose so much benefit from technology change, it is important for countries to coordinate their choice of input mix with the directions of technology bias if their technical changes are biased. The results indicate that both OECD and non-OECD countries tend to show capital-using/labor-saving, capital-using/energy-saving and energy-using/labor-saving technical change bias over the entire period. The production pattern of a majority of countries is shown to have been able to take advantage of their technological innovations.
机译:根据1991-2003年间99个国家的数据,对Malmquist指数及其技术变化和效率变化的构成进行了估算。特别是,发布了中性技术的假设,将技术划分为世界生产前沿和投入偏向技术的变化幅度,并表明为了获得更多的收益或没有从技术变化中损失太多收益,对于国家/地区,如果技术变化存在偏见,则应根据技术偏向的方向协调投入组合的选择,这一点很重要。结果表明,经合组织国家和非经合组织国家在整个时期内都趋向于显示出资本使用/节省劳动力,资本使用/节能以及能源使用/节省劳动力的技术变化偏向。事实证明,大多数国家的生产模式已经能够利用其技术创新。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号