首页> 外文期刊>Animal Production Science >Weed management practices in glyphosate-tolerant and conventional cotton fields in Australia
【24h】

Weed management practices in glyphosate-tolerant and conventional cotton fields in Australia

机译:澳大利亚耐草甘膦和常规棉田的杂草管理实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Forty growers in 4 major cotton-growing regions in Australia were surveyed in 2003 to investigate how the adoption of glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Roundup Ready) had influenced herbicide use, weed management techniques, and whether changes to the weed spectrum could be identified. The 10 most common weeds reported on cotton fields were the same in glyphosate-tolerant and conventional fields in this survey. Herbicide use patterns were altered by the adoption of glyphosate-tolerant cotton with up to 6 times more glyphosate usage, but 21% fewer growers applying pre-emergence herbicides in glyphosate-tolerant fields. Other weed control practices such as the use of post-emergence herbicides, inter-row cultivation and hand hoeing were only reduced marginally. However, growers indicated that management practices are likely to change over time, especially with the introduction of enhanced glyphosate tolerance technology (Roundup Ready Flex), and anticipate a 32% decrease in the number of growers using alternative weed management practices. To date, management practices other than glyphosate use have not changed markedly in glyphosate-tolerant cotton indicating a conservative approach by growers adopting this technology and reflecting the narrow window of herbicide application. The range of weed control options still being employed in glyphosate-tolerant cotton would not increase the risk of glyphosate resistance development.
机译:2003年,对澳大利亚4个主要棉花种植地区的40个种植者进行了调查,以调查耐草甘膦棉花的使用(Roundup Ready)如何影响除草剂的使用,杂草处理技术以及是否可以确定杂草谱的变化。在本次调查中,在棉田上报告的10种最常见的杂草在耐草甘膦和常规田间相同。通过使用耐草甘膦的棉花改变了除草剂的使用方式,草甘膦的使用量增加了6倍,但在耐草甘膦的田间使用出苗前除草剂的种植者减少了21%。其他杂草控制措施(例如使用出苗后除草剂,行间种植和hand手)仅略有减少。但是,种植者表示管理方法可能会随时间而改变,尤其是随着增强的草甘膦耐受技术(Roundup Ready Flex)的引入,并预计使用其他杂草管理方法的种植者数量将减少32%。迄今为止,耐草甘膦的棉花中除草甘膦以外的其他管理实践并未发生明显变化,这表明种植者采用该技术时采取了保守的态度,这反映了除草剂应用的狭窄窗口。仍在耐草甘膦的棉花中使用的杂草控制选择范围不会增加抗草甘膦的风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Animal Production Science》 |2006年第9期|p.1177-1183|共7页
  • 作者单位

    A School of Wine and Agriculture, University of Adelaide and CRC for Australian Weed Management, PMB 1, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia. B Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research Centre, Locked Bag 1001, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia. C CSIRO Plant Industry, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia. D Current address: ‘Stradbrooke Park’, PO Box 207, Clare, SA 5453, Australia. E Cotton Research and Developent Corporation, PO Box 282, Narrabri, NSW 2390, Australia. F Corresponding author: Email: jeff.werth@dpi.qld.gov.au;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    integrated weed management, resistance, survey, Roundup Ready.;

    机译:杂草综合管理;抗性;调查;综述。;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号