首页> 外文期刊>American Law and Economics Review >Guilt Shall Not Escape or Innocence Suffer? The Limits of Plea Bargaining When Defendant Guilt is Uncertain
【24h】

Guilt Shall Not Escape or Innocence Suffer? The Limits of Plea Bargaining When Defendant Guilt is Uncertain

机译:罪恶不会逃脱或无罪吗?当被告有罪时不确定辩诉交易的限度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines optimal prosecutor behavior with respect to plea bargaining when defendant guilt is uncertain. I show that when jury beliefs and behavior are determined endogenously in equilibrium along with defendant and prosecutor behavior, plea bargaining can play only a limited role in managing society's conflicting desires to maximize punishment of the guilty and minimize punishment of the falsely accused. In particular, while it can be optimal for prosecutors to use plea bargaining to induce a large fraction of guilty defendants to voluntarily sort themselves from the innocent, such sorting must come at the cost of imposing relatively short sentences on such guilty defendants who accept plea bargains.
机译:本文研究了在被告有罪的不确定性方面,针对辩诉交易的最佳检察官行为。我的研究表明,当陪审团的信念和行为与被告和检察官的行为是内生的平衡时,辩诉交易仅能在管理社会相互矛盾的愿望中发挥有限的作用,从而使对有罪人的惩罚最大化,对假告的惩罚最小化。特别是,虽然检察官最好利用辩诉交易诱使很大一部分有罪的被告自愿从无辜者中进行自我分类,但这种分类必须以对接受辩诉交易的有罪被告施加较短的刑期为代价。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Law and Economics Review》 |2007年第2期|305-329|共25页
  • 作者

    David Bjerk;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics Claremont McKenna College;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号