...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Perfusion-sensitive MR Imaging of Gliomas: Comparison between Gradient-echo and Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging Techniques
【24h】

Perfusion-sensitive MR Imaging of Gliomas: Comparison between Gradient-echo and Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging Techniques

机译:胶质瘤的灌注敏感MR成像:梯度回波和自旋回波回波平面成像技术之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The different sensitivities to vessel size of gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GE-EPI) and spin-echo EPI (SE-EPI) might indicate the relative cerebral blood volumes (rCBVs) of different tumor sizes. The techniques of GE-EPI and SE-EPI were compared for detecting low- versus high-grade gliomas. METHODS: Six patients with low-grade gliomas and 19 patients with high-grade gliomas underwent two perfusion-sensitive MR procedures, one produced by a GE- and the other by an SE-EPI technique. Maximum rCBV ratios normalized with rCBV of contralateral white matter were calculated for evaluation. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Maximum rCBV ratios of high-grade gliomas obtained with the GE-EPI technique (mean, 5.0 ± 2.9) were significantly higher than those obtained with the SE-EPI technique (mean, 2.9 ± 2.3) (P = .02). Maximum rCBV ratios of low-grade gliomas obtained with the GE-EPI technique (mean, 1.2 ± 0.7) were almost equal to those obtained with the SE-EPI technique (mean, 1.2 ± 0.6), and there was no significant difference (P = .66). The difference in the maximum rCBV ratios between the low- and high-grade gliomas reached significance when obtained with the GE-EPI technique (P = .01). CONCLUSION: The GE-EPI technique seems more useful for detecting low- versus high-grade gliomas than the SE-EPI technique.
机译:背景与目的:对梯度回波平面成像(GE-EPI)和自旋回波EPI(SE-EPI)对血管 大小的不同敏感性可能表明不同肿瘤大小的相对脑血容量 (rCBVs)。比较了GE-EPI和 SE-EPI技术检测低度和高级神经胶质瘤的方法。 方法:6例低度神经胶质瘤患者和19例 经历了两种对灌注敏感的MR 程序,一种由GE-生产,另一种由SE-EPI 技术生产。计算以对侧 白质的rCBV标准化的最大rCBV比值,以进行评估。 P <.05被认为是统计学上显着的。 结果:通过GE-EPI技术获得的高级神经胶质瘤的最大rCBV比值(均值, 5.0±2.9)显着高于用SE-EPI技术获得的平均值(平均值, 2.9±2.3)(P = .02)。通过GE-EPI技术获得的低级 神经胶质瘤的最大rCBV比率(平均值为1.2± 0.7)几乎与通过SE-EPI技术获得的> (平均值1.2±0.6),并且没有显着性差异 (P = .66)。当使用GE-EPI技术获得 时, 低级和高级神经胶质瘤之间的最大rCBV比值的差异达到了显着性(P = .01)。 结论:与SE-EPI技术相比,GE-EPI技术似乎对于检测 低级和高级神经胶质瘤更有用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology》 |2001年第7期|1306-1315|共10页
  • 作者单位

    From the Departments of Radiology (T.S., Y.K., M.T.) and Neurosurgery (M.K., Y.U.), Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.;

    From the Departments of Radiology (T.S., Y.K., M.T.) and Neurosurgery (M.K., Y.U.), Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.;

    From the Departments of Radiology (T.S., Y.K., M.T.) and Neurosurgery (M.K., Y.U.), Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.;

    From the Departments of Radiology (T.S., Y.K., M.T.) and Neurosurgery (M.K., Y.U.), Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.;

    From the Departments of Radiology (T.S., Y.K., M.T.) and Neurosurgery (M.K., Y.U.), Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号