首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow Measurement with Dynamic Perfusion CT Using the Vascular-Pixel Elimination Method: Comparison with H215O Positron Emission Tomography
【24h】

Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow Measurement with Dynamic Perfusion CT Using the Vascular-Pixel Elimination Method: Comparison with H215O Positron Emission Tomography

机译:血管像素消除法动态灌注CT定量脑血流量测量:与H215O正电子发射断层显像的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Blood vessels are usually conspicuous on dynamic CT perfusion images. The presence of large vessels may lead to overestimation of the quantitative value of cerebral blood flow (CBF). We evaluated the efficacy of the vascular-pixel elimination (VPE) method in quantitative CT perfusion imaging, in comparison with positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS: Five healthy volunteers underwent CT perfusion and PET studies. A four-channel multi-detector row CT scanner was used. Dynamic cine scanning was performed after bolus injection of an intravenous contrast agent. CT-CBF was calculated by the central volume principle and deconvolution method. PET was performed after infusion of 15O-labeled water. PET-CBF was calculated by using a nonlinear least squares method. Average CBF values of the whole section, gray matter, and white matter with both CT and PET were compared after image registration. The comparison was performed with and without VPE. In the VPE method, the vascular pixels were defined by the cerebral blood volume value of the pixel. The threshold of VPE was changed from 5 to 20 mL/100 g. Pixel-by-pixel correlation between CT-CBF and PET-CBF and linear regression analysis were also performed. RESULTS: Without VPE, CT-CBF was overestimated in all subjects. As the VPE threshold decreased, CT-CBF decreased and the correlation coefficient increased. The best correlation was observed at a VPE threshold of 8 mL/100 g in four of the five subjects. Average CT-CBF values, without VPE, of the whole section, gray matter, and white matter were 59.01, 66.73, and 42.53 mL/100 g/min, respectively. With VPE (threshold, 8 mL/100 g), average CT-CBF values of the whole section, gray matter, and white matter were 45.56, 52.75, and 30.38, respectively. The corresponding PET-CBF values were 46.86, 50.89, and 38.20 mL/100 g/min, respectively. CONCLUSION: Vascular pixels should be excluded from the calculation of CT-CBF to avoid overestimation of the CBF values. If vascular pixels are excluded, CBF calculation with CT perfusion imaging is considerably accurate.
机译:背景与目的:在动态CT灌注图像上,血管通常很明显 。大血管 的存在可能导致对脑 血流(CBF)定量值的高估。与正电子发射断层扫描(PET)相比,我们评估了血管像素 消除(VPE)方法在定量CT灌注成像中的功效, 。方法:五名健康志愿者接受了CT灌注和 PET研究。 使用了四通道多探测器行CT扫描仪。推注静脉内造影剂后进行动态电影扫描。 CT-CBF采用 中心体积原理和反卷积法计算。在输注 15 O标记的水后进行 。使用非线性最小二乘法计算 的PET-CBF。图像配准后,比较整个断面的平均CBF值 ,CT和PET的灰质和白质。比较 是在有和没有VPE的情况下执行的。在VPE方法中,血管 像素由 像素的脑血容量值定义。 VPE的阈值从5更改为20 mL / 100 g。还进行了CT-CBF与PET-CBF之间的逐像素相关性和 线性回归分析。 结果:没有VPE,所有受试者的CT-CBF均被高估。 随着VPE阈值降低,CT-CBF降低,相关系数 增大。在五个受试者中的四个受试者中, 的VPE阈值达到8 mL / 100 g时,观察到了最佳的相关性。 整个切片的平均CT-CBF值(不包括VPE)灰色 和白色物质分别为59.01、66.73和42.53 mL / 100 g / min。使用VPE(阈值8 mL / 100 g)时,整个切片,灰质和白质 的平均 CT-CBF值分别为45.56、52.75和30.38,分别。相应的 PET-CBF值分别为46.86、50.89和38.20 mL / 100 g / min。 结论:计算中应排除血管像素 < / sup> CT-CBF,以避免过高估计CBF值。如果排除血管 像素,则CT灌注成像 的CBF计算非常准确。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology》 |2003年第3期|00000419-00000426|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Radiology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;

    Department of Radiology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;

    Department of Tracer Kinetics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;

    Department of Radiology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;

    Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;

    Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;

    Department of Radiology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号