首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Differences in Functional MR Imaging Activation Patterns Associated with Confrontation Naming and Responsive Naming
【24h】

Differences in Functional MR Imaging Activation Patterns Associated with Confrontation Naming and Responsive Naming

机译:与对抗命名和响应命名相关的功能性MR成像激活模式的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Direct cortical stimulation studies suggest that responsive naming is more widely distributed within the temporal lobe than confrontation naming and involves anterior temporal regions typically resected in a standard temporal lobectomy. The aim of the current study was to further demonstrate the anatomic dissociation between confrontation and responsive naming by using functional MR imaging (fMRI). METHODS: Twenty participants underwent fMRI while performing either a confrontation or responsive naming task. Regions of interest were identified within the anterior and posterior temporal lobe. RESULTS: Responsive naming produced more activation than confrontation naming within the dominant temporal lobe, with activation extending into the temporal pole. Activation in the dominant temporal lobe associated with responsive naming was observed in the superior, middle, and inferior temporal gyri but was limited to the middle temporal gyrus for confrontation naming. Although both naming tasks produced activation within the posterior temporal region of interest in all participants, responsive and confrontation naming produced activation within the anterior temporal region of interest in 90% versus 60% of the sample, respectively. Areas of the dominant hemisphere activated by both tasks included parts of the middle occipital and middle temporal gyri, inferior frontal lobe, and hippocampus, among others. CONCLUSION: Findings are consistent with cortical stimulation studies and suggest that responsive naming produces more widespread activation within the temporal lobe compared with confrontation naming. The activation more often included anterior temporal regions during responsive naming as compared with confrontation naming. In clinical cases where the functional assessment of the temporal lobe—particularly the anterior regions—is important, the current results suggest responsive naming should be a useful fMRI paradigm and may ultimately help predict the risk of postsurgical language changes.
机译:背景与目的:直接皮层刺激研究 建议响应命名比对立命名更广泛地分布在颞叶中,并且通常涉及前颞叶区域 本研究的目的是通过功能性MR进一步证明对抗和反应性命名 之间的 解剖分离。成像(fMRI)。 方法:20名参与者在执行 对抗或响应命名任务时进行了fMRI。在前后颞叶中识别出 感兴趣的区域。 结果:响应命名比对抗产生的激活更多。 在主导的颞叶内命名,激活扩展 进入颞极。在上,下,中颞回中观察到与响应性命名相关的优势颞叶的激活,但仅限于颞中部。回旋为对抗命名。尽管两个命名 任务都在所有参与者感兴趣的后颞区域 中激活,但是响应和对抗 命名在前颞区域都激活了<分别对90%和60%的样本感兴趣。两项任务激活的优势半球区域 包括枕中部和颞中回的sups部分,额叶下部的sups 以及海马等。 结论:研究结果与皮层刺激 研究一致,表明响应命名比颞叶对抗更能在颞叶内产生更广泛的 激活。 命名。与对立 命名相比,响应命名期间的激活更多地包括前颞部 区域。在临床上,对 颞叶(尤其是前部区域)的功能评估很重要,目前的结果表明,响应性命名应 有用的fMRI范例,最终可能有助于预测术后语言改变的 风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology》 |2005年第10期|00002492-00002499|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA;

    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA;

    Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA;

    Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号