...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Single-Institution Experience with Matrix Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison with Same-Center Outcomes with the Use of Platinum Coils
【24h】

Single-Institution Experience with Matrix Coils in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison with Same-Center Outcomes with the Use of Platinum Coils

机译:单一基质治疗颅内动脉瘤的经验:与使用铂金线圈的同中心结果比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to analyze the outcomes and treatment-related complications of the polyglycolic/polylactic acid (PGLA)-coated Matrix platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms and compare these results with those derived from the same single-institutional experience with use of uncoated, bare platinum coils. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we compared 2 groups of patients in a retrospective fashion. The first group consisted of 70 consecutive patients who underwent 82 aneurysm treatments with Matrix coils during the 14-month period of study, from January 2003 to February 2004. We compared this cohort with 70 consecutive patients who underwent a total of 80 aneurysm treatments with bare platinum coils in the 12 months immediately preceding the use of PGLA-coated coils, from January through December 2002. We then recorded the treatment characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and any complications. RESULTS: There were similar baseline demographic characteristics between the 2 study groups except in age, anatomic location, and length of follow-up. The overall recurrence rate of aneurysms was 41% among the Matrix-treated group and 32% among the patients treated with bare platinum. Among the 42 patients treated with 100% Matrix, the rate of recurrence was 31%. Of the recurrences, 21% of the Matrix group, 19% of the 100% Matrix group, and 9% of the bare platinum group required retreatment. The overall rate of complications was 10% in the Matrix-treated group and 7% in the bare platinum group. There was not a statistically significant difference in the rate of recurrence of aneurysms or complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our single-center experience, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of Matrix coils over bare platinum coils, given their disadvantages.
机译:背景与目的:本研究旨在分析 聚乙二醇/聚乳酸 酸(PGLA)涂层基质铂线圈在治疗 sup> 颅内动脉瘤,并将这些结果与 来自相同的单机构经验,并使用 未涂覆的裸铂线圈。 sup>材料与方法:在这项研究中,我们以回顾性方式比较了两组 患者。第一组包括 ,在研究的14个月中,从2003年1月至2003年1月,连续70例患者接受了82例动脉瘤治疗的Matrix线圈治疗。 2004年2月。我们将该队列与 连续的 前连续12个月接受了80例动脉瘤治疗的患者进行了比较。从2002年1月到 十二月的使用PGLA涂层的线圈。然后我们记录了治疗特征, 血管造影结果和任何并发症。 结果:除了年龄,解剖位置, 和随访时间外,两个研究组之间的基线人口统计学特征 相似。基质治疗组的总动脉瘤 总复发率为41%,裸露铂治疗的 患者为32%。在 100%基质治疗的42例患者中,复发率为31%。在复发中,需要重新治疗的Matrix组为 21%,100%Matrix组为19%,裸铂组为9% 。 Matrix治疗组的总并发症发生率为10%,裸铂组的总并发症发生率为7%。两组之间的动脉瘤 或并发症的复发率在统计学上没有显着性差异。中心经验,鉴于缺点,没有足够的证据支持在裸铂线圈上使用矩阵线圈

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology》 |2007年第9期|00001736-00001742|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Neuroradiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo|Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo|Department of Neurosurgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Va;

    Neuroradiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo|Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo;

    Neuroradiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo;

    Neuroradiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo;

    Neuroradiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo|Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo;

    Neuroradiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo|Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号