...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Areca Nut Chewing and Mortality in an Elderly Cohort Study
【24h】

Areca Nut Chewing and Mortality in an Elderly Cohort Study

机译:一项老年队列研究中的槟榔咀嚼和死亡率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Compared with the well-documented association with betel-related cancer, little is known about the long-term effect of areca nut chewing on other fatal diseases. The authors' analyses were based on a population-based cohort study in Taiwan, including 4,049 participants aged 60 years or older enrolled in 1989 and 2,462 participants aged 50?66 years enrolled in 1996. Information regarding betel quid chewing and covariates was collected at baseline and was updated at subsequent interviews. Proportional hazards analysis was performed to determine the effect of chewing on all-cause and cause-specific deaths. During a mean follow-up of 9.5 years, 2,309 deaths occurred. Ever chewers were at higher risk of only total (hazard ratio = 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 1.35) and cerebrovascular (hazard ratio = 1.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.19, 2.30) deaths. Furthermore, increased chewing-years or quid-years appeared to be associated with increased mortality risk (linear trend: p = 0.02 for total mortality and p = 0.001 for cerebrovascular mortality). The authors found that, although betel quid chewing resulted in a statistically significant increase in the risk of total and cerebrovascular deaths in the elderly population, the associations were weak and should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to better understand the possible mechanisms of death.
机译:与有据可查的槟榔相关癌症相比,槟榔咀嚼对其他致命疾病的长期影响知之甚少。作者的分析基于台湾的一项基于人群的队列研究,其中包括1989年入组的4049名年龄在60岁以上的参与者和1996年入组的2462例年龄在50-66岁的参与者。有关槟榔咀嚼和协变量的信息是在基线收集的并在随后的采访中进行了更新。进行了比例危害分析,以确定咀嚼对全因和特定原因死亡的影响。在平均9.5年的随访中,有2309人死亡。曾经咀嚼的人只有全部死亡(危险比= 1.19,95%置信区间:1.05,1.35)和脑血管(危险比= 1.66,95%置信区间:1.19,2.30)较高的风险。此外,咀嚼年或quid-years的增加似乎与死亡风险增加相关(线性趋势:总死亡率p = 0.02,脑血管死亡率p = 0.001)。作者发现,尽管槟榔咀嚼导致老年人口总和脑血管死亡的风险在统计学上显着增加,但关联性较弱,应谨慎解释。需要进一步的研究以证实这些发现并更好地理解死亡的可能机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号