首页> 外文期刊>American journal of enology & viticulture >Fate of 15N fertilizer applied to trickle-irrigated grapevines.
【24h】

Fate of 15N fertilizer applied to trickle-irrigated grapevines.

机译:15N肥料的命运运用于滴灌的葡萄树。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

15-N enriched ammonium and nitrate fertilizers were applied in the spring through a trickle irrigation system to six Thompson Seedless vines in a vineyard on the West Side of the San Joaquin Valley of California. At fruit harvest, all above-ground plant parts were removed and analysed for 15N. Soil around each vine was also sampled and analysed for 15N in the inorganic and organic N fractions. Spatial patterns of fertilizer N for soil inorganic and organic N were analysed using a median polish technique which indicated large variability with respect to direction, distance, and depth. There was a greater tendency for the fertilizer N from NH4 to be located directly beneath emitters than that from the NO3. N from the NH4 application penetrated to only the 150-cm depth, whereas some N from the NO3 application reached 210-240 cm. Most of the organic fertilizer N for both NO3 and NH4 applications was in the top 60 cm of soil where the vine roots were likely of greatest density. Overall recovery of fertilizer N was also quite variable, probably due to variability in soil physical properties and uneven surface application of water and fertilizer due to local surface ponding. Although not statistically significant, uptake of fertilizer N by above-groundplant components was slightly higher for the NH4 application (24.2% of applied N) than for the NO3 application (21.5%). Soil organic N had significantly more N from NH4 (19% of applied N) than from NO3 (13%). This probably occurred due to longer residence time of N from NH4 within the top 60 cm, where the bulk of roots and microbial activity existed, than for NO3. Overall, about 67-79% of the fertilizer N applied in spring remained in the soil at harvest, and the vines took up the rest. There was no indication of significant N leaching below 2.4 m or denitrification of fertilizer N for the trickle-irrigated vines during the growing season.
机译:春季,通过a流灌溉系统,在加利福尼亚州圣华金河谷西侧葡萄园的六株汤普森无核葡萄藤上施用了富含15 N的铵和硝酸盐肥料。收获水果时,将所有地上植物的所有部分去除并分析15N。还对每棵葡萄藤周围的土壤进行了采样,并分析了无机和有机氮部分中的15N。使用中值抛光技术分析了土壤无机和有机氮的肥料氮的空间格局,该技术表明方向,距离和深度存在较大差异。来自NH4的肥料N比来自NO3的肥料更有可能直接位于排放源的下方。来自NH4施用的N仅渗透到150厘米深度,而来自NO3施用的一些N达到210-240厘米。无论是用于NO3还是NH4的大多数有机肥料N都位于土壤的最上面60厘米处,那里的藤根可能密度最大。肥料N的总体回收率也变化很大,这可能是由于土壤物理特性的变化以及由于局部地表积水造成的水和肥料表面不均匀施用所致。尽管没有统计学显着性,但NH4施用(占施氮量的24.2%)比NO3施用(占21.5%)地上植物成分对肥料氮的吸收略高。土壤有机氮的氨氮含量(占施氮量的19%)明显高于氮氧化物(占施氮量的13%)。这可能是由于氮从NH4到顶部60厘米(存在大量根和微生物活性)的停留时间比NO3更长。总体而言,春季施用的氮肥中约有67-79%保留在收获时的土壤中,而葡萄藤则吸收了其余部分。在生长季节,没有迹象表明滴灌的葡萄藤中氮的浸出明显低于2.4 m,也没有氮肥的反硝化作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号