...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of enology & viticulture >Assessing the United States Grape Industry's Understanding of Fungicide Resistance Mitigation Practices
【24h】

Assessing the United States Grape Industry's Understanding of Fungicide Resistance Mitigation Practices

机译:评估美国葡萄行业对杀菌剂阻力的理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In 2019, a national survey of 252 members of the United States grape industry from 20 states assessed knowledge perception of fungicide resistance management, application of that knowledge to vineyard practices, and knowledge acquisition sources. Overall, respondents demonstrated clear understanding of resistance management practices. The specific distribution of responses was influenced by the respondent's job role, duration of industry experience, and their farming operation size. Nationally, respondents were moderately familiar with the acronym FRAC (Fungicide Resistance Action Committee), with nearly 75% indicating they could identify the FRAC code of a fungicide. They felt moderately competent they could design a fungicide program that adhered to resistance management principles. Respondents identified fungicide resistance as a serious problem nationally, and as a moderate problem in their own vineyards. They ranked practices that include rotating fungicides of different FRAC codes, avoiding multiple sequential applications of the same trade name or FRAC code, tank mixing with different FRAC codes, using multisite products in a spray program, routine sprayer maintenance and calibration, and good canopy management as very-to-extremely important in managing fungicide resistance; whereas practices such as rotating between trade names and tank mixing different trade names ranked slightly important. Respondents identified university-based extension programs as the primary information resource for fungicide efficacy and fungicide stewardship (resistance management). To maximize potential effect, these results suggest that future educational efforts should be aimed at improving practices for fungicide resistance stewardship and should align with the knowledge-base and demographic factors of the target audience-particularly their job role, experience, and size of operation.
机译:2019年,来自20个州的252名美国葡萄行业成员的全国调查评估了对杀菌剂抵抗管理的知识感知,将该知识应用于葡萄园实践和知识获取来源。总体而言,受访者展示了对抵抗管理实践的清晰了解。应对的具体分布受到受访者的工作角色,行业经验期限及其农业运行规模的影响。全国性地,受访者对缩略词FRAC(杀菌剂抵抗行动委员会)进行了适度熟悉,近75%表示他们可以识别杀菌剂的FRAC代码。他们感受到适度称职,他们可以设计粘附在抵抗管理原则的杀菌剂计划。受访者认为杀菌剂抵抗作为一个严重的问题,并作为自己的葡萄园中的中等问题。它们排名的实践包括不同FRAC代码的旋转杀真菌剂,避免了相同的商品名或FRAC代码的多个顺序应用,用不同的FRAC代码混合,在喷涂程序中使用多路型产品,常规喷雾器维护和校准,以及良好的树冠管理在管理杀菌剂抵抗方面非常重要;而诸如在商品名和坦克之间旋转的实践,混合不同的商品名称排名略显重要。受访者认为基于大学的延长计划作为杀菌剂疗效和杀菌剂管理的主要信息资源(抗性管理)。为了最大限度地提高潜在效果,这些结果表明,未来的教育努力应旨在改善杀菌剂抵抗管理的实践,并应与目标受众的知识库和人口因子保持一致 - 特别是他们的工作角色,经验和操作规模。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American journal of enology & viticulture》 |2021年第2期|181-193|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Washington State University - Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center 24106 North Bunn Road Prosser WA 99350;

    University of California - Cooperative Extension 1710 Soscol Ave. Suite 4 Napa CA 94559;

    The Ohio State University - CFAES Wooster 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster OH 44691;

    University of Georgia - Plant Pathology Department 2105 Miller Plant Sciences Building Athens GA 30602;

    Michigan State University - Department of Plant Soil and Microbial Sciences 578 Wilson Road 105 CIPS East Lansing MI 48824;

    United States Department of Agriculture - Agriculture Research Service Horticulture Crops Research Unit 3420 NW Orchard Ave Corvallis OR 97331;

    Washington State University - Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center 24106 North Bunn Road Prosser WA 99350;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    disease management; FRAC; grape powdery mildew; grower perceptions; spray programs; viticulture;

    机译:疾病管理;弗拉克;葡萄粉状霉菌;种植者感知;喷雾程序;葡萄栽培;
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号